Originally posted by ripper81
View Post
On the other hand, once someone manages to support a specific hardware in a specific opensource implementation like OpenRazer, it becomes far easier for other brand-agnostic projects to implement a general solution and handle brand/model specifics beneath the hood.
AFAIK OpenRazer already acts as a sort of reference implementation of Razer hardware quirks and features for other software like piper and OpenRGB to pick up on. It's a mutually beneficial colaboration instead of an actual competing solution like all the windows junk specialty software.
Let's also not forget that some brands (cof... cof... Logitech... cof!) use specialty software released only for some products as an artificial means to justify price tiers by software features, while the software could be unified and the features could most often than not be offered for their entire portfolio.
In those regards, Linux's opensource ecossystem stands a reasonable chance of actually surpassing the UX provided by windows helper apps in the long run.
OpenRGB is one such case, remarkably allowing users to drive devices from multiple brands through the same RGB control scheme, using coherent lighting routines that the brand itself might not offer, in sync with one another, which on windows is made into a many-app hell.
*= I say "hobby devs" here because specialty hardware is still driven by unpaid contribuitions from users instead of professionals being apid to do so... however there has been an uptick in professional linux dev efforts for this area of support and we must state quite clearly that Linux itself is by far not a hobby project anymore but instead a huge multilateral effort across big companies, with stellar governance to steer and keep it together
Leave a comment: