Originally posted by DrYak
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Firefox 99 Available With Strengthened Linux Sandbox, Web MIDI
Collapse
X
-
- Likes 2
-
Well, till now, no hardware acceleration, and FF99 brings with it a lot of "Mozilla porn features", we loose a lot of privacy with this browser, with time..
My understanding is that we need a new browser in the block that starts by implementing Security in its core..
Like no cookies shared between windows,or instances, etc..
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by tuxd3v View PostWell, till now, no hardware acceleration, and FF99 brings with it a lot of "Mozilla porn features", we loose a lot of privacy with this browser, with time..
My understanding is that we need a new browser in the block that starts by implementing Security in its core..
Like no cookies shared between windows,or instances, etc..
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ironmask View Post
Well, it's not what you're directly asking for, but Brave is indeed in the forefront of "secure, yet usable/compatible" browsers. It's no wonder it's made by the original CEO of Mozilla. Firefox is a husk of what it was, it's nothing but a parody of Chrome now.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Quackdoc View Post
i would rather just go the ungoogled chromium route myself.
Comment
-
Chromium-based browsers are unusable without fractional scaling and proper VA-API support.
It is broken in Firefox, but at least they will hopefully fix this soon. Chromium project never gave a hope that VA-API would be supported officially, they accept the patches, but it will be always unsupported.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ironmask View PostWell, it's not what you're directly asking for, but Brave is indeed in the forefront of "secure, yet usable/compatible" browsers. It's no wonder it's made by the original CEO of Mozilla. Firefox is a husk of what it was, it's nothing but a parody of Chrome now.
I just wanted to have a really decent, from a security point of view, of a classical browser.
Where you can choose your search engine, where you can choose to block ads or scripts and such..or even to isolate cookies that belong to a window, from the other windows, etc
One browser that starts to be appealing is falcon.the problem is heavy dependency in Qt..
It also added now a Screen capture feature that I think... its a bit dangerous..
Comment
-
Originally posted by tuxd3v View PostBrave have some nice things, but then you are with brave search, yes you can disable ads, but then you have the Brave own network of adds too, a cryptowallet, and a cryptocoin BAT... this concept is a bit alien to me.
I just wanted to have a really decent, from a security point of view, of a classical browser.
Where you can choose your search engine, where you can choose to block ads or scripts and such..or even to isolate cookies that belong to a window, from the other windows, etc
One browser that starts to be appealing is falcon.the problem is heavy dependency in Qt..
It also added now a Screen capture feature that I think... its a bit dangerous..
I really don't understand this argument. "I don't know how to feel about Brave, because of all those optional opt-in features! I don't know what to do with them all!" it sounds sarcastic, how is this an actual thing people respond with when asked about Brave? What is this clown logic? Sorry, I'm assuming you use Linux since you post here? Do you know what options Linux has? It's a lot more than the couple opt-in things Brave has, I can tell you that.
Comment
Comment