Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

GNOME 42 Improves XWayland Auto Termination Handling

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • GNOME 42 Improves XWayland Auto Termination Handling

    Phoronix: GNOME 42 Improves XWayland Auto Termination Handling

    The latest GNOME 42 feature work to mention is a ten month old merge request landing that cleans up and improves the XWayland termination for when there are no more X11 clients running within the GNOME Wayland session...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite

  • #2
    Gosh, this won't be needed for centuries. Chances are you will *always* have at least a couple of X11 programs running at any given time

    Comment


    • #3
      Staying with MATE. Kthxbye Gnome.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by kpedersen View Post
        Gosh, this won't be needed for centuries. Chances are you will *always* have at least a couple of X11 programs running at any given time
        I seldom use X11 programs...

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by franglais125 View Post

          I seldom use X11 programs...
          Sure...

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by kpedersen View Post

            Sure...
            Frankly 80% of the time I use Firefox, Evolution, gedit, LO or totem. They all run natively on wayland and x11 is not needed

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by torsionbar28 View Post
              Staying with MATE. Kthxbye Gnome.
              I liked the idea of MATE, but it always felt a bit glitchy when I used it. If I go that route it will be XFCE.

              Comment


              • #8
                For me it's Wayland native 95% of the time. The missing 5% would be me using Signal Desktop which recently got broken under Wayland and I have to run it under Xwayland still.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by kpedersen View Post

                  Sure...
                  Why not? It's the same for me... Lots of apps still require special configurations/cares in order to be able to run Wayland, but most of them do.
                  ## VGA ##
                  AMD: X1950XTX, HD3870, HD5870
                  Intel: GMA45, HD3000 (Core i5 2500K)

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by kpedersen View Post
                    Gosh, this won't be needed for centuries. Chances are you will *always* have at least a couple of X11 programs running at any given time
                    This isn't nowhere near an accurate claim these days. For plenty of users, there are no X11 programs that they need and for users that need it, having XWayland terminate properly when they shutoff a program that uses it is still a pure win.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X