Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

LibreOffice Lands Initial Code For Qt6 Toolkit Support

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • LibreOffice Lands Initial Code For Qt6 Toolkit Support

    Phoronix: LibreOffice Lands Initial Code For Qt6 Toolkit Support

    Merged this morning into the LibreOffice code-base is the initial Qt6 VCL plug-in...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite

  • #2
    Who uses Qt6?

    Anyway, I love their multiplatform approach.

    Would it be feasible to use VCL for apps outside the LibreOffice umbrella?

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by timofonic View Post
      Anyway, I love their multiplatform approach.
      Would it be feasible to use VCL for apps outside the LibreOffice umbrella?
      If you are willing to write a separate backend for each platform, yes, you can wirte the interface using the generic VCL and a lot of different rendering paths. And create custom widgets for each platform if needed.

      Comment


      • #4
        But how is the GTK4 work coming along?

        Comment


        • #5
          I hope this isn't their plan for fixing the micro font problem on Wayland when using KDE.

          Comment


          • #6
            Why do they need multiple toolkits?
            Just stick with one and make a look that sticks across the multiple OS (like Blender)...

            Anyway, this project is such a waste.
            A decade it's been created to improve over OOo and a decade later, it's still is OOo by 99 percent, same UI, same perf, same issues, same too big code base...

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by rmfx View Post
              Why do they need multiple toolkits?
              Just stick with one and make a look that sticks across the multiple OS (like Blender)...

              Anyway, this project is such a waste.
              A decade it's been created to improve over OOo and a decade later, it's still is OOo by 99 percent, same UI, same perf, same issues, same too big code base...
              What the heck are you talking about? The number of commits have been massive; it's OpenOffice where development has stalled. They did add a new optional UI, significant new features, better performance, and cleaned up the code base.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by rmfx View Post
                Why do they need multiple toolkits?
                Just stick with one and make a look that sticks across the multiple OS (like Blender)...

                Anyway, this project is such a waste.
                A decade it's been created to improve over OOo and a decade later, it's still is OOo by 99 percent, same UI, same perf, same issues, same too big code base...
                do you even use it? sounds like you are talking nonsense.

                Comment


                • #9
                  "optional new UI" is that a joke? The 7 options are just rearrangements of the same 1990s dated interface.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by tornado99 View Post
                    "optional new UI" is that a joke? The 7 options are just rearrangements of the same 1990s dated interface.
                    Dated but usable - quite the opposite to for example ms office.
                    Personally, i know which combination of "dated/"modern" " and "usable/UX-nightmare" i prefer

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X