Chrome doesn't seem as stable when running 100+ tabs. Even the tab navigation sucks. Some tabs get stuck and seems to slow down a lot. Firefox can handle all background tasks, both active and passive ones.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Firefox 92 vs. Chrome 94 Browser Benchmarks On Ubuntu Linux
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Mez' View PostWho cares about these?
Chrome is a 600bhp racing Dacia, fast but utter crap.
Chrome has been stripped down of everything useful and is fast, like a racing car with the driver's seat only and a bare metal interior.
Like a racing car though, once on the roads there's nothing you can do comfortably with it. And there are so many limitations to it that you prefer the more versatile 150 bhp SUV, that is not as fast but with which you can hit your commute as much as your errands or your holidays travel. Even Microsoft have understood that with Edge.
And indeed it's quickly become the only decent competition to Firefox.
Google is sabotaging Chrome, probably a bit less on the desktop than on the mobile front where it's already unusable. It's already dying the way IE did.
- Likes 8
Comment
-
Originally posted by brad0 View PostThat is exactly how Firefox is. The dumb wankers at Mozilla Corp have been destroying everything about Firefox and turning it into a useless pile of crap. Hell bent on sabotaging any success they might have at literally every turn. It's no surprise Firefox has been losing it's userbase at an alarming rate.
My answer would be: quantum was one of the best things they ever did. Firefox before quantum got dead slow, crashy and just not fun to use anymore. They needed to modernize their stack. They needed to make it reliable, even while that killed lots of old extensions. If they wouldn't have done this, firefox would be much more obsolete then it's now.
Since they released quantum and it's follow up releases they've become competitive again.
My gripe: It took them too long until they reached that insight. They should have gone that step much sooner.
And firefox is still much more versatile than chrome.
Originally posted by brad0 View PostAlso the last Firefox UI redesign was a complete joke. It's like they were copying the Fisher Price designed UI macOS Big Sur picked up.
Originally posted by brad0 View PostThe SUV analogy is awful. They're more like 500 bhp with a chassis that weighs twice as much as the race car. SUV's are poor to maneuver and bloated ass heavy. Just another example of North American ignorance and stupidity.
Originally posted by caligula View PostChrome doesn't seem as stable when running 100+ tabs. Even the tab navigation sucks. Some tabs get stuck and seems to slow down a lot. Firefox can handle all background tasks, both active and passive ones.
- Likes 3
Comment
-
Originally posted by caligula View PostChrome doesn't seem as stable when running 100+ tabs. Even the tab navigation sucks. Some tabs get stuck and seems to slow down a lot. Firefox can handle all background tasks, both active and passive ones.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by brad0 View PostThat is exactly how Firefox is. The dumb wankers at Mozilla Corp have been destroying everything about Firefox and turning it into a useless pile of crap. Hell bent on sabotaging any success they might have at literally every turn.
Comment
-
Originally posted by krzyzowiec View PostI can get hardware accelerated video on Firefox but not Chromium/Brave.
Can you share your HW / display server / etc, and the half-dozen or so about:config flags that you're using? (And any env vars beyond the MOZ_X11_EGL=1 base requirement). Thanks.
- Likes 2
Comment
Comment