can't av1 be decoded with cuda/opencl/whatever?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
AV1 Decoder dav1d Lands 10-bit AVX2 Assembly For Big Speed-Up, Thanks Facebook + Netflix
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by cl333r View Post
Hm interesting, I've never heard this argument before, the only thing I heard was that jpegxl is better than or equal to AVIF at everything.
Originally posted by curfew View PostI beg to differ. Software decoding causes my laptop's fans to spin up like crazy. Firefox recently optimized their hardware decoding to be about 50 % more efficient than in previous versions, so now the difference should be pretty major, although I haven't tried that. But even video players are horribly slow in software rendering mode.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by andreano View PostI hope this unlocks more 10-bit content. For those that may not know, 8-bit encoding does not save any space (on the contrary, you need more bitrate to avoid banding). It only makes sense for decoding performance.
Comment
-
Very nice
Fate's irony - Netflix contribute something to open-source project but in the same time - it cannot be used for Netflix content in Linux.
I mean: Netflix 10-bit 4K content has insane DRM requirements - there is no free Linux distribution that could handle it. Only commercial forks like Android on dedicated hardware could handle it.
No HDR support in Linux distributions it is another story, but at least in this area there is some progress...
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Danniello View PostVery nice
Fate's irony - Netflix contribute something to open-source project but in the same time - it cannot be used for Netflix content in Linux.
I mean: Netflix 10-bit 4K content has insane DRM requirements - there is no free Linux distribution that could handle it. Only commercial forks like Android on dedicated hardware could handle it.
No HDR support in Linux distributions it is another story, but at least in this area there is some progress...
AV1 in the end google and netflix need it to cut costs for bandwidth. so they will start with the largest and easiest ones. if they determine, that shows that Iinux does support, are big bandwidth eaters, they will go for them, if not, they won't for a while, but I assume most of their library will be getting the av1 treatment eventually.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Quackdoc View Post
I suspect the first ones to get AV1 treatment would be the shows that are consumed en masse. this will also be 10-bit 1080p content, as 10-bit is far superior to 8-bit in terms of efficiency, so even 8-bit 1080p content will be getting the av1 treatment.
AV1 in the end google and netflix need it to cut costs for bandwidth. so they will start with the largest and easiest ones. if they determine, that shows that Iinux does support, are big bandwidth eaters, they will go for them, if not, they won't for a while, but I assume most of their library will be getting the av1 treatment eventually.
Linux clients (legally 720p max, with addon "hack" - some content could be played with 1080p but not everything - many movies require DRM even for lowres like 1080p) or even Windows clients are minority for them.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Toggleton View Post
Nearly all videos that are AV1 on Youtube are 8bit and 8bit is already fast on nearly all CPUs. Would be nice if they would bring 10bit cause banding is a problem on Youtube.
In this playlist are videos that have a av1 10bit(+HDR) version but even if you set Youtube to "always prefer AV1" it does not serve it in firefox on a ryzen3600.
With youtube-dl - f 401+251 URL
will you get the av1 version to test it (399=1080p 400=1440p 401=4k)Last edited by fafreeman; 12 May 2021, 05:26 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ms178 View PostAlso I haven't heard much about AV2 or AVIF, I still would like to see a replacement of JPG sooner rather than later.
- Likes 1
Comment
Comment