Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

GNOME 40 Introducing Headless Native Backend, Virtual Monitors

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • aphos
    replied
    Could this be used to use a tablet as a second monitor of sorts with VNC? What is best for this use case (lowest latency)

    Leave a comment:


  • JackLilhammers
    replied
    144Hz Nobody is saying that Gnome is a dictatorship, because it's not.

    Gnome is an oligarchy.
    As most of the open source software, for that matter.

    Leave a comment:


  • jacob
    replied
    I haven't read the details but I'm not sure if remote display on servers is the primary use case for this (for one thing this is virtual monitor management, not virtual/remote input). It could be more targeted at applications like screen recording, streaming, display virtualisation for VMs/containers etc.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mez'
    replied
    Originally posted by 144Hz View Post
    Mez' And a special one for you mez. Nvidia/X11 stuff. Developed by people not wearing red hats.
    https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutte..._requests/1726
    Please stop mentioning me. Forget my existence altogether so that I can freely forget yours. Thanks.

    Leave a comment:


  • oleid
    replied
    Originally posted by ChristianSchaller View Post
    Actually main motivation for writing this was for people wanting to run a desktop on headless systems like servers, where they connect remotely to a desktop to run diagnosis etc.
    In the MR it says a render node is required. Does this mean we need some kind of 3D acceleration on the server?

    Leave a comment:


  • oleid
    replied
    Originally posted by mb_q View Post
    WayVNC already works nicely, but you need sway or other wlroots WM.
    And a running session, so probably a display.

    Leave a comment:


  • oleid
    replied
    Originally posted by ferry View Post

    Actually it's a very old idea. 30 years ago it was normal to have like 4 X clients to a server using XDMCP.
    Yes, and that was horribly unsafe.

    There is also xpra you can use for remoting apps. But the nice thing about this implementation is not having to use a virtual X server.

    Leave a comment:


  • ezst036
    replied
    Can this be used for multiseat on one single video card?

    Leave a comment:


  • curfew
    replied
    Originally posted by RedEyed View Post

    Brilliant point!

    Will use it in similar discussions, when someone say that thing X exists Y years xD
    Brainless parrotting without any original input never did anyone any good.

    Leave a comment:


  • RedEyed
    replied
    Originally posted by angrypie View Post
    SMP exists since the 60s and 64-bit computing since the 70s. The point is the implementation.
    Brilliant point!

    Will use it in similar discussions, when someone say that thing X exists Y years xD

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X