Chrome Moving To A 4-Week Release Cycle

[Mez']

Oh boy...

[tuaris]

Web browsers these days hard code a lot of things that were not traditionally done so. Now as a result the web browsers need to be updated more often to keep up with the ever changing public Internet. This results in centralization and is against what the Internet was originally envisioned as. A good example of that can be seen here: https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-centr...reloadList.inc

TLS in general is centralization of the Internet (and opens the door towards censorship), but the approach browsers vendors are taking to HSTS makes it so that they have to constantly release updates. These lists change more often than Root CA's.

Another thing.. if you actually look at the HSTS preload list, you'll see it's full of mostly useless domains that hosts ads, spam, gambling, and phishing sites. So it seems like this is having a bad side effect.

[60Hz]

There never was "meritocracy", and there will never be if there's a white patriarchy standing in it's way, hence why the latter needs to be torn down. Only then can there be true meritocracy.

Braindead.

[Brisse]

Braindead.

You could have just admitted you don't have any good arguments instead of admitting to being "braindead".

[BesiegedAce]

Standard in name only. There are only 2 vendors left in the game in any meaningful way. The others are almost completely reliant on Chromium and whatever direction Google chooses to take it.

We've been swindled by Google into helping them with their power grab. The "modern" web is a scam and an anti-pattern.

I've said it before and I'll say it again; the death of EdgeHTML, whether or not you use Microsoft Edge (probably not for most people here), was not good in the long run. I hope that Microsoft open-sources EdgeHTML. While still having Firefox/Gecko is better than nothing, a duopoly is not ideal. You don't have to love or even like Microsoft to appreciate that EdgeHTML existing (and providing needed competition to Blink/Chrome(ium) was a good thing.

[60Hz]

You could have just admitted you don't have any good arguments instead of admitting to being "braindead".

You could have just admitted that you're an insecure brainlet who can't compete on equal terms in a meritocracy, so you have to try to gaslight people into thinking it's not a real thing.

The only problem with that is....you're only going to convince people that are equally as dumb and insecure as you are.

[Brisse]

You could have just admitted that you're an insecure brainlet who can't compete on equal terms in a meritocracy, so you have to try to gaslight people into thinking it's not a real thing.

The only problem with that is....you're only going to convince people that are equally as dumb and insecure as you are.

When you have no arguments to support your fragile and perverse world-view, you resort to bullying and intimidation to reinforce, and attempt to justify your privileged position. It must feel good to keep telling yourself that you accomplished something in life, because "meritocracy". It's just a shame that it's all delusions of grandeur, and that you have to stomp on fellow egalitarian humans in the process.

[60Hz]

When you have no arguments to support your fragile and perverse world-view, you resort to bullying and intimidation to reinforce, and attempt to justify your privileged position. It must feel good to keep telling yourself that you accomplished something in life, because "meritocracy". It's just a shame that it's all delusions of grandeur, and that you have to stomp on fellow egalitarian humans in the process.

Yawwwwwwwn. Utterly brainwashed.

[Brisse]

Yawwwwwwwn. Utterly brainwashed.

What an amazing display of debate skills. You should give classes in how to loose debates. You would be very good at it.

[60Hz]

What an amazing display of debate skills. You should give classes in how to loose debates. You would be very good at it.

Why would I even attempt debate with a lackwit who thinks meritocracy is a "social construct"? It'd be like trying to play chess with an ape. You're suffering from levels of Dunning-Kruger that shouldn't even be possible.