Google Is Already Experimenting With WebP2 As Successor To WebP Image Format

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • phoronix
    Administrator
    • Jan 2007
    • 67186

    Google Is Already Experimenting With WebP2 As Successor To WebP Image Format

    Phoronix: Google Is Already Experimenting With WebP2 As Successor To WebP Image Format

    Google engineers are already working on WebP2 as the next-generation version of their still image file format...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite
  • ms178
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2018
    • 1704

    #2
    When you thought one standard will rule them all (AVIF) a new one comes along...

    Comment

    • davidbepo
      Senior Member
      • Nov 2014
      • 936

      #3
      why even do this? WebP is already good, for the best u want AVIF

      Comment

      • Old Grouch
        Senior Member
        • Apr 2020
        • 675

        #4
        I suggest supporting JPEG XL instead, which incorporates techniques from FLIF. The world does not need another half-baked format. Unfortunately, if it is incorporated into Chrome...

        Comment

        • cl333r
          Senior Member
          • Oct 2009
          • 2296

          #5
          Originally posted by davidbepo View Post
          why even do this? WebP is already good, for the best u want AVIF
          Yeah, and why bother creating a new WebP2 when AVIF is already finished and known to be better than WebP2?

          Comment

          • AmericanLocomotive
            Senior Member
            • Aug 2017
            • 217

            #6
            Well, considering a bunch of Google Suite products don't even support importing WebP yet...

            Comment

            • birdie
              Banned
              • Jul 2008
              • 3368

              #7
              So is it still based on VP9 or it now uses AV1? Or it has its own VP9 implementation? I'm confused.

              Comment

              • OneTimeShot
                Senior Member
                • Apr 2010
                • 718

                #8
                I'm almost at the point of saying that maybe JPEG isn't good enough for a 4k image... but, yeah, it's really hard to justify yet another image format.

                I'll wait to see which one is still around in 10 years' time.

                Comment

                • Templar82
                  Senior Member
                  • Jan 2018
                  • 264

                  #9
                  I think I have only seen the original webp in the wild once...

                  Comment

                  • tildearrow
                    Senior Member
                    • Nov 2016
                    • 7096

                    #10
                    And everyone forgot about FLI-

                    Originally posted by Old Grouch View Post
                    I suggest supporting JPEG XL instead, which incorporates techniques from FLIF
                    Ughhhhh

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X