I think what Nate is doing is clever and worthwhile in several respects:
- KDE users feel like it's a living project worth using and supporting (however one might like to support a project). Call it Customer Relations if you like.
- Potential KDE users have something to get excited about. This could be construed as Marketing when viewed through a certain lens.
To me, Nate's excitement comes off as genuine and that's something that's hard to buy but easy to respect and appreciate both as a current and potential KDE user.
FWIW, I used to be primarily a GNOME Shell user but now I'm a happy KDE user. The features KDE give me out of the box just makes me feel slightly more catered to than GNOME Shell default UX, where I feel I need to install 5-10 extensions to get the convenience features I appreciate (and to help me change the workflow+shortcuts+muscle-memory-actions to be more aligned when switching back and forth between Windows and Linux).
Don't get me wrong, I respect GNOME Shell's focus on a clean and uncluttered UX and I happily use said UX on my HTPC because of its big buttons. I also appreciate how the GNOME Shell's move to gitlab has made it much easier to appreciate the amount of work and the quality of engineering that goes into GNOME Shell development.
So, yeah, personally I feel like the friendly competition between GNOME Shell and KDE Plasma Desktop + Apps + Frameworks is making both products better I guess?
- KDE users feel like it's a living project worth using and supporting (however one might like to support a project). Call it Customer Relations if you like.
- Potential KDE users have something to get excited about. This could be construed as Marketing when viewed through a certain lens.
To me, Nate's excitement comes off as genuine and that's something that's hard to buy but easy to respect and appreciate both as a current and potential KDE user.
FWIW, I used to be primarily a GNOME Shell user but now I'm a happy KDE user. The features KDE give me out of the box just makes me feel slightly more catered to than GNOME Shell default UX, where I feel I need to install 5-10 extensions to get the convenience features I appreciate (and to help me change the workflow+shortcuts+muscle-memory-actions to be more aligned when switching back and forth between Windows and Linux).
Don't get me wrong, I respect GNOME Shell's focus on a clean and uncluttered UX and I happily use said UX on my HTPC because of its big buttons. I also appreciate how the GNOME Shell's move to gitlab has made it much easier to appreciate the amount of work and the quality of engineering that goes into GNOME Shell development.
So, yeah, personally I feel like the friendly competition between GNOME Shell and KDE Plasma Desktop + Apps + Frameworks is making both products better I guess?
Comment