Hmm, I remember the early days of pulseaudio, I just hope it isn't pulseaudio 2 bugfest.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
PipeWire Is In Increasingly Great Shape - Ready For More User Testing
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Slartifartblast View PostHmm, I remember the early days of pulseaudio, I just hope it isn't pulseaudio 2 bugfest.
But, yeah, I agree and hope this won't be a repeat because Pulseaudio still has a bad reputation from those days.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Slartifartblast View PostHmm, I remember the early days of pulseaudio, I just hope it isn't pulseaudio 2 bugfest.
- Likes 12
Comment
-
Originally posted by tildearrow View PostJACK sink? Does this mean being able to output PipeWire to JACK?
Code:...PipeWire is being done with the aim of being ABI compatible with ALSA, PulseAudio and JACK, meaning that PulseAudio and Jack apps should just keep working on top of Pipewire without the need for rewrites (and with the same low latency for JACK apps).
- Likes 10
Comment
-
Originally posted by muncrief View PostI have great hope for PipeWire but after spending a few days dedicated to trying to get it to work on Arch recently I had to surrender to defeat.
Something like:- systemctl --global mask pulseaudio.service
- pacman -S pipewire-pulse
- create /etc/ld.so.conf.d/pw-pulse.conf with /usr/lib/pipewire-0.3/pulse
- add NoExtract = usr/lib/libpulse* to pacman.conf
- pacman -S libpulse
- reboot
Don't use wireplumber it currently doesn't work with the latest pipepewire.
Multilib and flatpaks will not support this setup.
It would be surprising if Bluetooth works.
- Likes 3
Comment
-
Originally posted by tildearrow View PostJACK sink? Does this mean being able to output PipeWire to JACK?
It actually means Pipewire can create a JACK audio sink interface for running applications that need JACK to work. All this without having JACK installed, of course.
Pipewire is supposed to replace both Pulseaudio and JACK so it has to provide the same interfaces to userspace.
- Likes 8
Comment
-
Originally posted by Slartifartblast View PostHmm, I remember the early days of pulseaudio, I just hope it isn't pulseaudio 2 bugfest.
That's all fixed by now, the transition should be much smoother.
I'm sure Ubuntu will ship a broken pipewire in a LTS so we will still get shelllshocked people that will swear up and down that it's bad and should be burned at the stake and that the first thing they do is uninstall it and use ALSA and claim that since ALSA can mix multiple sources already (which is true) there is no point for pipewire just like there was no point for pulseaudio
- Likes 9
Comment
-
Originally posted by kpedersen View Post4) Can this allow me to spawn a 9999x9999 resolution session and connect to it?
You kind of have to expect that when communities allow commercial companies to take control and "govern" the direction of projects
I'm strongly suspecting that these people would still be working on these things even on their own, although much more slowly as it's not their day job.
- Likes 6
Comment
-
Originally posted by starshipeleven View Postwhy you need a 9999x9999 resolution in your session?
Originally posted by starshipeleven View Postgiven that they mostly sell an OS for servers and services connected to it anyway.Last edited by kpedersen; 04 September 2020, 05:47 PM.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by ssokolow View Post
In what context? ...and define "simple. unified, customized, cascading".
...because, for the main launcher menu, in KDE, you can get a "cascading" launcher menu by choosing Unlock Widgets from the panel menu, then right-clicking the default launcher and choosing Alternatives, then choosing "Application Menu". (ie. It's a different widget. "Alternatives" is an easy way to swap between widgets which serve the same role without manually deleting one then adding the other.)
Then, you can right-click it and choose "Application Menu Settings..." to adjust "unified" and "simple".
Finally, you can right-click and choose "Edit Applications..." and you'll get a menu editor for "customized".
But, to be fair, I really like blue, and abhor all dark themes, so there really isn't much pre-built, for KDE or Gnome, that I like. Which is why I spent so much time over the years building my own custom GTK2/GTK3 theme for XFCE.
And like I said, I really like simple and direct desktops, but KDE was an endless stream of pop-ups and notifications and other stuff that I find unnecessary and bothersome. Of course I could have spent a lot of time turning all those blingy things off, and building a custom theme for KDE, but then I might as well stick with XFCE. However I know many people love that kind of stuff, including my son, so I'm glad KDE and Gnome are available for those with different tastes and styles.
Comment
Comment