Originally posted by Azpegath
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
GNOME Shell's Icon Grid Could See Almost Double The Performance
Collapse
X
-
- Likes 1
-
Originally posted by 144Hz View PostYou know what is not properly tested? KDEPIM. It’s 2020 and KDE can’t do basic communication or mails in a reliable way.- PIM is, as you said, broken.
- SMB is in many cases barely usable.
- Large file needs to be transfered to the cache until they can get opened.
- KDE provides an Indexing service, that is also broken, but even if it works ↓
- KIO is an Inselloesung and will not work with non-kde apps. So you might not be able to search and share a files, depending on the framework your apps use
- Displayrotation is still a hard problem.
- Sometimes I can scroll inside my 2 screens (one is rotated 90°)
- Printer setup is a nightmare
- WiFi Password management is in many cases just a fight with kwallet
- Likes 3
Comment
-
Originally posted by tildearrow View PostHe said "preinstalled".- do not remember the name of that application;
- do not remember the icon of that application either;
As a matter of fact a menu organization exists from the very first existence of any UI, it is the more natural and rational way to organize entries, but a simple grid sorted by use or alphabetically does not have any rational organization; and when it became superior to a menu organization is something that happened in one of the esoteric and hidden Gnome coven reunion...
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by Alexmitter View PostWay before Qt isn't in full control of a greedy company anymore.
You know, developing actual FLOSS software, software that isnt also sold under a greedy proprietary license is a thing of passion for the community, not a race.
Considering the financial support and contribution power difference between Gnome and KDE, I think Plasma does pretty well for itself thanks.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Delgarde View Post
That's the thing I don't get about the complaints about the grid... because I've been using Gnome 3 pretty much since it came out, and I've almost never used that feature. Everything is so readily keyboard accessible, that if they completely replaced the grid with something different in the next release, I probably wouldn't notice.
So in this sense, the grid actually prohibits me from using it correctly. I must consider this to be a (perhaps minor) design flaw.
That aside, it would be interesting to see a more usability-wise powerful paradigm of listing applications. I can't tell you what I want, but I know I want something better =)
The semi-old windows start-menu is actually better, there you have both a hierarchy that is navigable AND you can launch stuff by only typing.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by lumks View PostYes, there are also MANY problems on the GNOME side of things. Both of them are not perfect in any way. I need some things, because I do my work with and for the last 2 years, that's not possible with KDE Plasma, but works just fine with Gnome and thats the thing. Gnome is slow, but works. KDE is fast, but broken.
The KIO/SMB issues have also been handled afaik with some recent updates mentioned in Nates blog. SMB may need an additional package installed that some distros may ship or acquire on-demand, but other distros may not have any integration out of the box and expect the user to install the package themselves. I don't personally use SMB so I can't comment much more beyond that, I use several GTK apps and haven't run into any KIO problems.
Last I used Gnome(which was a few years back), it was slow, buggy and kinda ugly(I could use a theme, but it'd often break with updates). The issues with Gnome was on a few distros iirc and I had tried it on several systems(home and work) before moving to KDE Plasma, which wasn't perfect(especially back then), but still provided me with a system I could actually use, which wasn't really the case with Gnome.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
-
Comment