Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Two Areas KDE Can Use Help Right Now In Porting For Plasma 6.0

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by 144Hz View Post
    bug77 Read again! The CLA dictates what YOU should do to get patches into Qt Upstream. It doesn’t dictate how Qt should ship Qt Downstreams. When Qt decides some modules are commercial-only then you just have to accept it. Yeah it sucks, but hey what would expect from Qt?
    How is this different from, let's say, RHEL? Some things are free, some aren't. And similar to RHEL, very little is not covered by GPL: https://www.qt.io/product/features

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by 144Hz View Post
      Qt is commercial with CLA.
      Qt is dual licensed commercial/GPL-something, you stupid GNOME shill.

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by 144Hz View Post
        bug77 RHEL is a distribution built from hundreds of projects. It doesn’t make sense to compare Qt to RHEL. If you want to compare Qt to GTK then the difference is how the Upstreams are licensed. GTK is LGPL, Qt is commercial with CLA.
        It makes perfect sense to compare them, they're both commercial products built on open source.
        You keep bringing up licensing, people keep showing you the license doesn't make any difference. Luckily for you, you resist arguments pretty well.

        Comment

        Working...
        X