Top sites now appear when you select the address
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Firefox 75 Released With Flatpak Support, Wayland Improvements
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by 144Hz View Postandre30correia Kudos to any company who can make profit on doing the right thing.
Facts about Red Hat:
1) Red Hat are the largest contributor to Linux and Linux desktop.
2) Red Hat offers jobs and career opportunities all the way from entry level jobs to principal positions. Stuff like Wayland and systemd requires decade of experience.
3) Red Hat uses its market dominance to fight unethical CLA. If companies like Canonical or Qt had that position then they would exploit it.
There is nothing evil (or even benign) about CLA. Every project is governed by a license, CLA is just one type among many.
- Likes 8
Comment
-
Originally posted by uid313 View Post
Red Hat is making their money out of RHEL on servers, not on buttery smooth Linux desktop experiences.
But contributions to Firefox are to be commended regardless, the Internet would be in a much worse shape if FIrefox went away.
- Likes 4
Comment
-
Originally posted by andyprough View Post
You are confused. RHEL has never been free. And they are legally obligated to release changes to Firefox code. This is not charity - it's business. Very big business.
- Likes 15
Comment
-
Originally posted by TemplarGR View Post
If you haven't paid for it, then it is free. And in Firefox's case, it is not "free with strings attached", like most "free" things are. This is free in the most free-er form imagineable "take the code and do what the hell you want with it". We didn't pay Martin for his work, and it doesn't matter if he is a Red Hat employee or not, we still benefit from his hard work, and saying a simple "thank you" costs us nothing, stop being entitled children and recognize this fact.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by bug77 View Post
Will you stop this CLA hate already? It's getting beyond tiresome.
There is nothing evil (or even benign) about CLA. Every project is governed by a license, CLA is just one type among many.
There are some exceptions, the FSFs CLA allows them to relicense to future versions of GPL and is optional, and the Qt CLA has a requirement that the Qt company open source their changes or the entire thing gets relicensed to MIT.
The Canonical one, however just lets Canonical relicense the project in the future, which puts other companes and individuals off contributing, you don't see Red Hat requiring a CLA and Red Hat is opposed to them. Canonical/Mark Shuttleworth have even spent money trying to advertise that they're a good thing.Last edited by Britoid; 07 April 2020, 11:14 AM.
- Likes 6
Comment
-
Originally posted by 144Hz View Postandre30correia Kudos to any company who can make profit on doing the right thing.
Facts about Red Hat:
1) Red Hat are the largest contributor to Linux and Linux desktop.
2) Red Hat offers jobs and career opportunities all the way from entry level jobs to principal positions. Stuff like Wayland and systemd requires decade of experience.
3) Red Hat uses its market dominance to fight unethical CLA. If companies like Canonical or Qt had that position then they would exploit it.
- Likes 2
Comment
Comment