Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

GNOME Shell 3.35.3 Released With NVIDIA Driver Offloading, Fixes To Shell + Mutter

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • GNOME Shell 3.35.3 Released With NVIDIA Driver Offloading, Fixes To Shell + Mutter

    Phoronix: GNOME Shell 3.35.3 Released With NVIDIA Driver Offloading, Fixes To Shell + Mutter

    GNOME Shell 3.35.3 and Mutter 3.35.3 were released today as part of the next development step on the path towards GNOME 3.36 coming out in March...

    http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag...-3.35.3-Mutter

  • #2
    Expect some of these performance MRs to land upstream before 3.36

    https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutte...5.+Performance

    Comment


    • #3
      Can it run without XWayland?
      So it runs fully natively on Wayland without XWayland and without X.Org?

      Comment


      • #4
        uid313 Not yet.

        Comment


        • #5
          Those who want to test it on fedora, can use this: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/co.../fedora-gnome/

          Comment


          • #6
            I wonder when we will see NVIDIA hardware being properly supported under wayland, and perhaps also nvidia-settings (its all we got ).

            Is that all up to NVIDIA in the end? seems their pretty sour over the EGLSTREAMS fiasco.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by theriddick View Post
              I wonder when we will see NVIDIA hardware being properly supported under wayland, and perhaps also nvidia-settings (its all we got ).

              Is that all up to NVIDIA in the end? seems their pretty sour over the EGLSTREAMS fiasco.
              Asking developers to have to support 1000s (perhaps 10000s) of lines of code for just one vendor, who doesn't even follow the proper development model of the kernel, is kinda a punch in the face.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Britoid View Post
                Asking developers to have to support 1000s (perhaps 10000s) of lines of code for just one vendor, who doesn't even follow the proper development model of the kernel, is kinda a punch in the face.
                You could say the same about GNOME.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by archsway View Post

                  You could say the same about GNOME.
                  I forgot GNOME was closed source, sorry!

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by archsway View Post
                    You could say the same about GNOME.
                    Thats utter nonsense.

                    Archsway. I still really miss Devuanwindowmaker. Or Lindowstwm. Or Suseyawm. Can't be too long.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X