Originally posted by numacross
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Google Chrome To Begin Marking Sites That Are Slow / Fast
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by arQon View Post
Yeah, no kidding. My "favorite" was when every time YouTube was slow - sometimes because my conn was genuinely flaking out in a storm, but usually just because it somehow magically "needed" to buffer halfway through a video - Google's *immediate* "diagnostic" popup was "Switch to Chrome!".
Not "Lower the stream resolution" or "Don't use the 60FPS stream we automatically chose for you", just "Switch to Chrome", because obviously it could only POSSIBLY be the browser that's to blame.
And yeah, sure, I use Firefox and I'm well aware that Google has deliberately, repeatedly, sabotaged YouTube for both that and IE / Edge. But you'd think it would at least CONSIDER something other than the browser as the potential cause of playback issues... :P
I'm not QUITE so cynical as to imagine that the same site that knows I'm not using their spyware browser stalled the stream just because of the UserAgent string. But honestly, these days I wouldn't be SURPRISED to discover that it did, which is a pretty sad state of affairs for a company that really did generally adhere to "Don't Be Evil" before the MBA asstards took over.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ipkh View PostSites would load much quicker if the ad spots didn't keep changing. A static ad is fine, but lately the damn thing loads 1 ad for a few seconds and loads a different ad. So in essence the page never fully loads. And to think it's all Google's fault in the first place for selling ads on auction and starting this downward trend.
Way to solve your self created problem Google.
I always block ads from Google, so they can't get their cut, and to reduce the amount of information they have about me. Not to mention, ads deface every site they're on.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by starshipeleven View PostIf you go to a website through Google search, yes, yes they know. This is far from news.
Also this happens already with Google Safe Browsing as said by others
I can sort of see the justification for safety (though the quote on giving up liberties to gain safety comes to mind). Now sending my browsing data to Google so they can give me their opinion on the site I visit is another matter. But obviously this will be opt-in only, right?
Comment
-
Originally posted by DoMiNeLa10 View PostI can't wait for Google to inevitably start deciding which pages they deem good based on their politics and ideologies, rather than technical aspects. I guess this is a pretty good time to boycott them again over crap they're trying to pull off.
Comment
Comment