Originally posted by JeansenVaars
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Current Windows 10 vs. Linux Browser Performance For Google Chrome + Mozilla Firefox
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by andyprough View Post
And yet, Windows has serious memory leaks when running browsers, and often isn't capable of shutting one down without leaving multiple zombie processes running. Maybe there's something to be said for clean code?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by birdie View PostAside from SeleniumBenchmark: MotionMark, Windows wipes the floor with Linux.
The fact that it beats the windows version on some tests or even comes close to it with a bunch of accelerated rendering options disabled is already pretty amazing.
- Likes 2
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by treba View PostThe MotionMark results are really odd. On Windows, both browser use GPU accelerated graphics. In Linux at least Firefox doesn't (and it will stay that way until Webrender gets enabled by default)
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Weasel View PostApart from the obvious, it's probably also the advantage of closed source, no sarcasm. Nobody in their right mind releases in some stupid shit Debug mode (because it leaks source code info), while it's "the default" on some crappy build systems in open source because why not. Open Source devs tend to not give a shit about the end users or end binary quality (how can you "forget" something is in debug build, wtf, they don't even inspect their binaries), just to keep their stupid code clean.
- Likes 5
Leave a comment:
-
something is very wrong here. I get those results on mint 19.04 with a 4770k at 4.3ghz, while windows is usually slower by 2k to 3k points in octane.
- Likes 2
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by bpetty View Post
1. You can do that on Windows too.
2. That is a bit anecdotal. For commercial windows development, I've only ever used VC++.
3. When there are more apps you want to run at the same time, that RAM goes fast Also, you must not be running KDE/Gnome.
4. You can get that with Cygwin or Windows subsystem for Linux
Throw Linux in a docker container and call it a day. Not hat'n, just stat'n.
1. You can cut the bloat way down in linux, and even go headless (although that's getting harder and harder, even if you only SSH into the machine, you need the graphic dependenciers more and more)
2. For portable code dev on C, nothing beats GCC, by a long shot. Sure, you can cygwin that. But you can't build and distribute the entire world, which is easy in linux (and even more in BSD, especially DragonflyBSD with Synth). You can't instantly create instances of Windows without licence headaches
3. The RAM is cached data, so it's not gone, and made free whenever you need it. Unused RAM is wasted RAM. Also, I don't think (might be wrong) that you can enable user-space hugetables in windows. You sure can in linux, and it sure speeds up stuff a lot when page trashing is the bottleneck. It is the bottleneck very often when dealing with a lot of data.
4. Windows subsystem is now POSIX compliant, which is fantastic. Great point.
5? Linux container, using hyper-V, is way slower than on linux. nvidia-docker is not available on windows, and probably never will be. Finally, Hyper-V is way slower than qemu-kvm.
- Likes 4
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by hubicka View Post
Thanks to Martin Liska LTO was recently enabled for opensuse build of Firefox. We did not enabled PGO yet because there is an issue with running the training run in the build service environment (Martin knows details). I plan to meet tomorrow also with the maintainer of Chrome package to get LTO+PGO enabled for Tumbleweed builds. So some work is being done on this (though I would wish it progressed faster, too)
Balloo sounds like an possible explanation. It is unlikely because of btrfs - those benchmarks are CPU bound.
- Likes 4
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by xorbe View PostI tried to bring Tumbleweed's perf to the attention of the community, but everyone turns a blind eye, and even rbrown of opensuse calls this site trash. I don't know what's going on. I have no problems with my installation (though I run ext4 and turn off mitigations), but I'd simply like to know the root cause of the perf delta. Default file system? Kernel? Boot options? Compiler flags? Cpu governor? Firefox options?
Also, it would help to know if this was on an Intel or AMD system.
- Likes 7
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by bpetty View Post
1. You can do that on Windows too.
2. That is a bit anecdotal. For commercial windows development, I've only ever used VC++.
3. When there are more apps you want to run at the same time, that RAM goes fast Also, you must not be running KDE/Gnome.
4. You can get that with Cygwin or Windows subsystem for Linux
Throw Linux in a docker container and call it a day. Not hat'n, just stat'n.
- Likes 4
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: