Originally posted by msotirov
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
PipeWire Should Be One Of The Exciting Linux Desktop Technologies For 2019
Collapse
X
-
I wonder if there will be a way to have bit perfect audio with PipeWire? Currently I can bypass PulseAudio and send music directly to ALSA without any kind of conversions. I didn't see any mention of this on the website when I looked.
When I am playing music right now I use Deadbeef to take my 192Khz/24bit FLAC files and send it directly to ALSA. It does lock sound out of the rest of the system as Deadbeef has ALSA locked down but I am good with that, I don't want other garbage messing up my music. I don't want a bunch of resampling, stray sounds or, shaping of the music. I then take the digital output of my sound card and send it to my external DAC and the rest of my sound system.
Comment
-
Originally posted by vsteel View PostI wonder if there will be a way to have bit perfect audio with PipeWire? Currently I can bypass PulseAudio and send music directly to ALSA without any kind of conversions. I didn't see any mention of this on the website when I looked.
- Likes 6
Comment
-
Originally posted by vsteel View PostI wonder if there will be a way to have bit perfect audio with PipeWire? Currently I can bypass PulseAudio and send music directly to ALSA without any kind of conversions. I didn't see any mention of this on the website when I looked.
When I am playing music right now I use Deadbeef to take my 192Khz/24bit FLAC files and send it directly to ALSA. It does lock sound out of the rest of the system as Deadbeef has ALSA locked down but I am good with that, I don't want other garbage messing up my music. I don't want a bunch of resampling, stray sounds or, shaping of the music. I then take the digital output of my sound card and send it to my external DAC and the rest of my sound system.
The reason 192/24 sounds better is because they generally put more care into mastering when they sell you 192/24 audio and, surround vs. stereo aside, it'd sound just as good if they sold you a CD-quality (44.1/16) downmix made with the same degree of care from the same master. Aside from being an indicator that they probably put more effort into mastering properly, 192/24 is just intended as a temporary format for mastering and mixing to give the equipment and filters more wiggle room to avoid rounding errors and other kinds of degradation as the audio engineers apply various different stages of processing on the recording.
Monty from Xiph.org (the guy who came up with Ogg Vorbis) wrote a lengthy and heavily-cited article on the details of this.
- Likes 11
Comment
-
Originally posted by JAYL View PostTypo: also tieing intoLast edited by Vistaus; 03 February 2019, 01:18 PM.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
I still don't get what you mean. I'm using KWin in Debian. It's quite different from let's say Mutter.
Comment
-
Comment