Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

A Quick Benchmark Of Mozilla Firefox With WebRender Beta vs. Chrome

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • cl333r
    replied
    Originally posted by Weasel View Post
    Too bad your battery or power usage can perceive it.

    Rust wastes more power than proper C++ (not with a million bounds checks) so it's causing global warming more.
    I know you're not serious + I'm a C++ dev, but if you're referring to rust checking the loops at runtime - in release mode it only checks for the first and last index so it doesn't make any difference, if that's what you implied.

    Leave a comment:


  • anarki2
    replied
    Good to know that Firefox again sucks a little less. User since around 0.7, I'm afraid I'm stuck with this stuff forever

    Leave a comment:


  • Weasel
    replied
    Originally posted by eydee View Post
    In a real life scenario, the difference is a page loading in 0.1 or 0.2 seconds. Not really something a human being can perceive.
    Too bad your battery or power usage can perceive it.

    Rust wastes more power than proper C++ (not with a million bounds checks) so it's causing global warming more.

    Leave a comment:


  • Michael
    replied
    Originally posted by NiLSPACE View Post
    I got a Motionmark score of 440.44 on my AMD 2600X + RX 580 which seems way less powerful than the 9900K and Vega 64/2070 you used. I run the benchmark on Windows 10, perhaps WebRender is more optimized on that. Any chance you could try this on Windows as well?
    I don't keep any active Windows installs around, only when running interesting tests.

    Leave a comment:


  • eydee
    replied
    In a real life scenario, the difference is a page loading in 0.1 or 0.2 seconds. Not really something a human being can perceive. It's the same crap as operating systems competing on boot time. Your OS booting in 6 or 7 seconds changes absolutely nothing in your life.

    Leave a comment:


  • luben
    replied
    Accidentally I run the MotionMark benchmark today with Firefox 64beta + MOZ_WEBRENDER=1 on my laptop with integrated intel GPU - Chrome-72 is twice faster but it consumes 2 cores fully, Firefox consumes just one core.

    Leave a comment:


  • Anvil
    replied
    i still cant see Webrender being Default untill Firefox67 at the latest.

    Leave a comment:


  • NiLSPACE
    replied
    I got a Motionmark score of 440.44 on my AMD 2600X + RX 580 which seems way less powerful than the 9900K and Vega 64/2070 you used. I run the benchmark on Windows 10, perhaps WebRender is more optimized on that. Any chance you could try this on Windows as well?

    Leave a comment:


  • Weasel
    replied
    Originally posted by pal666 View Post
    i'm not shocked, i know firefox is the slowest browser
    Of course, because of Rust.

    Leave a comment:


  • pal666
    replied
    i'm not shocked, i know firefox is the slowest browser

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X