Originally posted by uid313
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Project Darling Is Still Trying To Run macOS/OSX Software On Linux
Collapse
X
-
All opinions are my own not those of my employer if you know who they are.
- Likes 1
-
Originally posted by thelongdivider View PostA decent video and photo editing suite for Linux with GPU acceleration would completely my needs without any compatibility layer.
GIMP-GTK3 and GIMP in general have been picking up steam but we don't know when that ship will come in (I already use GTK3 branch and it's fantastic).
Krita is the closest Swiss Army Knife to Photoshop with Blending Options, Vector, Bitmap layers, Adjustment Masks, Rulers, Vector Shapes, etc... the only major thing I can think of holding them back is their Text Tool being cobbled together which they're redoing as part of their kickstarter this year.
Premiere Pro? I'm no video buff but I'm trying KDenLive and LightWorks.
I would much rather run Photoshop through the macOS version though so I really do hope Darling improves. I check them out from time to time to see how development is going.
Then there are secondary tools that exist as Photo Editing buffs like GColorPicker3, Pixeluvo (An excellent basic photo editor in the style of Photoshop for 35$.)
If Corel or someone else did a Linux release of a major tool I would be all over that.
Comment
-
Originally posted by thelongdivider View PostA decent video and photo editing suite for Linux with GPU acceleration would completely my needs without any compatibility layer.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Ericg View Post
Being commercial and proprietary doesnt mean the software is inherently bad or of low quality... There's plenty of open source software that looks like it was coded by monkeys, and plenty of closed source systems that are relied upon, and must, function perfectly otherwise people could die.
I don't want a Mac, because there everything costs money.
To be honest, I rather see commercial proprietary Mac software not available on Linux, else it might poison the ecosystem and result in more and more software becoming proprietary.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ericg View PostBeing commercial and proprietary doesnt mean the software is inherently bad or of low quality... There's plenty of open source software that looks like it was coded by monkeys, and plenty of closed source systems that are relied upon, and must, function perfectly otherwise people could die.
Differences are that with Open you can:
-know it is shit down to the core and therefore stay away from it
-improve meh projects into something reliable (by PC standards anyway).
Comment
Comment