Benchmarking Debian GNU/Hurd 2015 vs. GNU/Linux

[phoronix]

Phoronix: Benchmarking Debian GNU/Hurd 2015 vs. GNU/Linux

Since the release of Debian GNU/Hurd 2015 and GNU Hurd 0.6 this year, I've been meaning to run some new performance benchmarks considering my previous Hurd benchmarks were last done in 2011.

http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=21948

[Gapil301]

Everything from gnu project is bad, hurd is not an exception

[busukxuan]

Everything from gnu project is bad, hurd is not an exception

Bash too?

[Gapil301]

Bash too?

bash is gud

[duby229]

Well, Hurd needs a couple hundred people to coordinate for a few years. But that won't happen without a corporation to organize it and to fund it.

[busukxuan]

bash is gud

I believe you know that bash was written for GNU, am I correct?

[Gapil301]

I believe you know that bash was written for GNU, am I correct?

You are

[TumultuousUnicorn]

HURD is not very competitive with Linux.

Everything from gnu project is bad, hurd is not an exception

Like autohell ? Haha.

[Michael_S]

Everything from gnu project is bad, hurd is not an exception

Really?
Coreutils? Bash? CLisp (A Common Lisp implementation)? Guilde (A Scheme implementation)? R? GCC? Emacs?

[werfu]

Everything from gnu project is bad, hurd is not an exception

Everything from GNU is open source, which means project that have been taken on and used by scores of users and developers have thrived while some others simply didn't made it. Hurd is simply GNU own kernel, but Linux took up the place. And don't bash on GNU, in the 80-90s they played a very important role and without them I don't think we'd have all that Linux ecosystem.