Seems people don't understand what is this project about. It's a compatibility layer to adapt systemd-services calls to OpenBSD/FreeBSD daemons calls. By example, systemd-timed replacement it's a wrapper for OpenBSD OpenNTPD.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
OpenBSD Made Progress On Their Systemd-Compatible Replacement
Collapse
X
-
We need more efforts like this
I am a Systemd advocate. I also do not believe choice for choice's sake is a desirable thing in infrastructure as critical as an init system. Having said that, I recognize that one never knows from which direction innovation will come. In addition, Lennart has said that porting Systemd to other kernels is non-trivial (http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/the-biggest-myths.html Myth #15). Therefore I support this effort to allow Systemd dependent software to run on non-Systemd systems.
Comment
-
An utter waste of programmer time aim to fragment FLOSS
One thing this project will achieve is an obsolete compatibility layer that matches systemd versions from 10 years ago (Just like the Linux compatibility layer of BSD) but even then that's just be optimistic. They'll most likely fail as implementing systemd-like interfaces requires a kernel too advance for BSD devs to comprehend. It'll be like caveman trying (and failing) to understand how nuclear fusion works. Don't hold your breath, just switch to Linux. It makes far more sense then this. Also, you can be sure that Antoine Jacoutot and Landry Breuil did this on their MacBook Pros and never tested it on OpenBSD.
Originally posted by blackout23They should fork the real thing, adapt it to OpenBSD and maintain compatibility with the Linux systemd interfaces which are used by Gnome & Co.
Originally posted by BwackNinjaHere's the link to the repository:
Originally posted by rmillerSeems people don't understand what is this project about. It's a compatibility layer to adapt systemd-services calls to OpenBSD/FreeBSD daemons calls. By example, systemd-timed replacement it's a wrapper for OpenBSD OpenNTPD.
Originally posted by IronlennuTherefore I support this effort to allow Systemd dependent software to run on non-Systemd systems.
Comment
-
Originally posted by endman View PostNo, we don't like more efforts like this to waste developer time. OpenBSD devs and these "students" are trying to find a solution to a problem that has already been solved. How to solve it? Switch to Linux. End of Story.
Comment
-
Magnificent!
Can they PLEASE port it back to Linux? Under Gentoo I still have the choice but once a DE suddenly has systemd as hard dependency for whatever weird reasons (thanks god I was never really into Gnome) you're out of luck.
While I am not against a refreshment of the init system I don't think that neither systemd nor its main inventor nor the fanboys (Stockholm / Apple syndrome) have matured yet. And PID 1 implies a lot of responsibility. It is nothing to be messed with easily.Stop TCPA, stupid software patents and corrupt politicians!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Adarion View PostMagnificent!
Can they PLEASE port it back to Linux? Under Gentoo I still have the choice but once a DE suddenly has systemd as hard dependency for whatever weird reasons (thanks god I was never really into Gnome) you're out of luck.
While I am not against a refreshment of the init system I don't think that neither systemd nor its main inventor nor the fanboys (Stockholm / Apple syndrome) have matured yet. And PID 1 implies a lot of responsibility. It is nothing to be messed with easily.
Comment
-
Originally posted by alaviss View PostDebian's devs already created systemd-shim for emulating systemd components.
Yet fanboys still claim that systemd isn't pervasive.
Comment
-
Originally posted by endman View PostOne thing this project will achieve is an obsolete compatibility layer that matches systemd versions from 10 years ago (Just like the Linux compatibility layer of BSD) but even then that's just be optimistic. They'll most likely fail as implementing systemd-like interfaces requires a kernel too advance for BSD devs to comprehend. It'll be like caveman trying (and failing) to understand how nuclear fusion works. Don't hold your breath, just switch to Linux. It makes far more sense then this. Also, you can be sure that Antoine Jacoutot and Landry Breuil did this on their MacBook Pros and never tested it on OpenBSD.
Originally posted by endmanThey can't the OpenBSD kernel lacks the features to do that and it cannot handle it without crashing. The same goes for other BSDs, that's why it's the BSD zealots who have been creating that BoycottSystemd propaganda. Systemd leaves them behind and they cannot port it to their shitty kernel.
Originally posted by endmanI've seen it. It looks horrible, they could have better spent their time improving Linux then doing this shit. By the way https://uglyman.kremlin.cc/gitweb/gi...=systembsd.git. We now know who funded this project.
Originally posted by endmanWhy would anyone use OpenNTPD when literally every other implementation is for accurate.
Originally posted by endmanNo, we don't like more efforts like this to waste developer time. OpenBSD devs and these "students" are trying to find a solution to a problem that has already been solved. How to solve it? Switch to Linux. End of Story.
Originally posted by AdarionCan they PLEASE port it back to Linux? Under Gentoo I still have the choice but once a DE suddenly has systemd as hard dependency for whatever weird reasons (thanks god I was never really into Gnome) you're out of luck.
Comment
Comment