30-Day Status Update On The LibreSSL OpenSSL-Fork

[Vim_User]

We? I thought the whole thing about open source is that there doesn't have to be a consensus. Everyone does something, you use your favourite/the clear winner some time down the road.

But what sense makes it to put money into a project with such a sad track record, when it is very clear that money is not the problem, but the attitudes of developers and style of development?

[ncopa]

Yes, because OpenBSD devs are not skilled enough to work with and modify the API/BI of OpenSSL.

You are aware of that modifying code without modifying the API/ABI is more difficult?

[rmiller]

The Linux foundation will never fund anything OpenBSD project or anything related to Theo the Rat especially after his false claims about Linux's code quality and user attitude. But most importantly they'll never fund anything that is Microsoft and Apple friendly. Plus in the long run, Everyone knows OpenSSL will prove to be the better option while "Libre"SSL which be nothing but a joke.

OpenSSL has BSD licence. LOL.

[rmiller]

OpenSSL is BSD to...

The Linux foundation will never fund anything OpenBSD project or anything related to Theo the Rat especially after his false claims about Linux's code quality and user attitude. But most importantly they'll never fund anything that is Microsoft and Apple friendly. Plus in the long run, Everyone knows OpenSSL will prove to be the better option while "Libre"SSL which be nothing but a joke.

OpenSSL has a BSD license. LOL.

[jake_lesser]

OpenSSL has a BSD license. LOL.

No it's Apache 2 license.

[rmiller]

No it's Apache 2 license.

Yes my mistake. But it's not apache 2 either. It's similar to original apache license, one of many that the anti-bsd troll hates.