Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
MidnightBSD 0.4 Betters The FreeBSD Desktop
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Luke_Wolf View PostYou can develop proprietary applications in Qt for free... It's just if you modify the Qt source code itself that you need to release your changes under LGPL unless you get a license from Digia.
If you don't static-link or don't release, then you can use GPLed Qt, but none of the proprietaries can do that.
Originally posted by YoungManKlaus View PostBecause talking to people to get your features included in mainline to make _one_ good system is way too much effort.
Originally posted by Cthulhux View PostActually, OSX is a horrid NeXTStep wannabe - which was a full-featured BSD.
Next time try to read more about the basics.
"Full-featured BSD" - whats that? The only "full featured BSD" I know, its when "parts-bin BSD" becomes proprietary under EULA (like MacOSX), is it what you mean by "full featured BSD", are they targeting that, those "Free Software, but no GPL" geniuses?
Its obvious to me why they used ?toil?, not because its any "good", only because its "BSD" - that's moronic, unless its just for laughs.Last edited by brosis; 07 July 2013, 03:20 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by brosis View Post(Stupid Qt asks money for proprietary, when it should get all for free, you know).
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Cthulhux View PostAfter all, ?toil? is a pretty good approach to a modern desktop, even 20 years after the design was widely spread.
I still wonder why it hasn't gained a wider audience yet.
(Also I thought MidnightBSD was dead. I was wrong, obviously.)
A long list of pathetic excuses why use BSD can be found here.
Pathetic, because they refuse GPL because they want to link from-ground-up-anti-gpl CDDL (and yet, they don't!) and "other licenses" (such as wonderful EULA);
they also want to embed code in documentation.... -_________- completely omitting the fact that author can grant GPL for code and say BSD or FDL for documentation.
But, if you want to help develop some proprietary 20-year old embedded UI, then this solution is pretty *fine*, as it gets. (Stupid Qt asks money for proprietary, when it should get all for free, you know).
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: