Originally posted by MaxToTheMax
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Eight-Way BSD & Linux OS Comparison
Collapse
X
-
-
Last time I checked, people didn't choose their preferred operating system because of some milliseconds for specific tasks.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by oleid View Post@Michael: Instead of testing both Ubuntu and Linux Mint - which are practically identical library-wise, I'd have rather seen results for Debian. I'd be interesting whether the good overall performance comes from the mother distribution, or is home made.
For a reasonable comparison, Debian testing could be used, wich is the recommended for desktop/non-critical use.
Debian loves you, why don't love Debian Michael? XDLast edited by malkavian; 27 May 2013, 04:42 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by phoronix View PostPhoronix: Eight-Way BSD & Linux OS Comparison
[...]The contenders for this performance roundabout include PC-BSD 9.1, DragonFlyBSD 3.4.1, Ubuntu 13.04, Linux Mint 15 RC, CentOS 6.4, Fedora 18, Mageia 3, and openSUSE 12.3. [...]
Leave a comment:
-
CentOS fastest on Nexuiz
Was surprised to see CentOS be fastest on Nexuiz, considering it focus on server and stability.
Too bad DragonFly BSD was missing from many tests...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by phoronix View PostPhoronix: Eight-Way BSD & Linux OS Comparison
Being benchmarked today at Phoronix is a comparison of eight different BSD and Linux operating systems. The contenders for this performance roundabout include PC-BSD 9.1, DragonFlyBSD 3.4.1, Ubuntu 13.04, Linux Mint 15 RC, CentOS 6.4, Fedora 18, Mageia 3, and openSUSE 12.3. Which of these operating systems are the fastest and slowest for a variety of different workloads? Read on to find out.
http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=18742
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BO$$ View PostSo Ubuntu is pretty much at the top (along with Mint). It's gonna be fun to see the Canonical haters spew some more horseshit about how shitty Ubuntu is.
Anyway, i thought you were trolling for MS now? Weren't you just going on about how much linux sucked? Now you're back to being pro-Ubuntu again, i guess?
Leave a comment:
-
This benchmark was quite interesting to me. Particularly the anomalous Mageia position. Why would setting the scheduler to performance lower the performance, as opposed to ondemand? That doesn't make much sense to me...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MaxToTheMax View PostWhy are you still using Nexuiz? It's an obsolete version of the same engine as Xonotic, and is consistently outperformed by Xonotic. Not very interesting.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BO$$ View PostSo Ubuntu is pretty much at the top (along with Mint). It's gonna be fun to see the Canonical haters spew some more horseshit about how shitty Ubuntu is.
Seems to me that compared to other similar AGED distros, it won some, and lost some. Overall, about the same. THAT IS PERFORMANCE ONLY, which is far from the only consideration when selecting a distro. You know that some people choose their distribution philosophically, don't you? Their (canonical's) lack of upstream contribution is a great reason to avoid them. Also their crappy UI, and other attempts to break compatibility with GNU/Linux.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: