i see everybody including Michael missed the point so il' put it bold
ITS A PROJECT FOR A STATIC VERSION OF ARCH LINUX !!
its not about BSD or linux or what libc it uses, its just a project for making a statically linked userspace
musl is chosen cuz glibc dosent fully support static linking
bsd tools are chosen cuz GNU are made with glibc in mind
etc etc
y'all should at least check their web site before ranting nonsense
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Starch Linux: OpenBSD Atop Arch's Linux Kernel
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Ultrich View PostLook at github.com/StarchLinux/coreutils
In it only few utils like bsd tr and sed, nothing more.
Main utils based on util-linux from kernel.org
github.com/StarchLinux/starch-ports/blob/master/core/util-linux/PKGBUILD
For the util-linux utilities: It is natural that some of those will have to be included since the distro is dealing with a Linux kernel (and thus Linux file systems).
The significant remainders of GNU would be GCC, gmake, gfindutils
Strangely enough bash is still included but mksh should (become?) the default system shell.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by staalmannen View Postlook closer.
The "coreutils" is not the GNU coreutils but rather an assembly of suckless.org "sbase" and OpenBSD utilities.
In it only few utils like bsd tr and sed, nothing more.
Main utils based on util-linux from kernel.org
github.com/StarchLinux/starch-ports/blob/master/core/util-linux/PKGBUILD
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Ultrich View PostIt's fake project. In repository only packages utilslinux and coreutils, nothing form OpenBSD.
The "coreutils" is not the GNU coreutils but rather an assembly of suckless.org "sbase" and OpenBSD utilities.
I guess they have used the name "coreutils" for Arch compatibility reasons.
Last edited by staalmannen; 25 January 2013, 11:28 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
It's fake project. In repository only packages utilslinux and coreutils, nothing form OpenBSD.
Leave a comment:
-
It is fake
It's fake. Look at the project core repository (http://mirror1.starchlinux.org/pkg/core/) recomended for update. It install standard utillinux and coreutils packages. Nothing used from OpenBSD.
Leave a comment:
-
Does this mean that some people will hate it for the Linux kernel while others will hate it for the OpenBSD user space?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ncopa View PostThis is directly false.
They were pretty early with propolice and stack smashing protection. They implemented W^X and they are pretty good with privilege separation. (read about why they wrote their own ntpd and invented BSD auth instead of PAM and the privilege separation ideas they implemented there).
Basically, they assume that the software that runs is buggy and tries to make it hard to exploit those bugs. Thanks to this they have discovered many bugs in 3rd party apps and thus contributed that Linux userland has become safer.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BSD SUCKS DICKS View PostThere, Just relying on the barely OS to have no holes and thus no layers of protection.
They were pretty early with propolice and stack smashing protection. They implemented W^X and they are pretty good with privilege separation. (read about why they wrote their own ntpd and invented BSD auth instead of PAM and the privilege separation ideas they implemented there).
Basically, they assume that the software that runs is buggy and tries to make it hard to exploit those bugs. Thanks to this they have discovered many bugs in 3rd party apps and thus contributed that Linux userland has become safer.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: