Benchmarking ZFS On FreeBSD vs. EXT4 & Btrfs On Linux

[kraftman]

"There is only one full time paid developer" So?

Some proof? Afaik there are many more.

[doubledr]

"There is only one full time paid developer" So?

[Jimbo]

No, no, no you lie, you are under heavy fudding masturbation! you don't even know what you have written.

(opinion)In my opinion, if Oracle really wants to bet on BTRFS, Oracle should have assigned a whole team of developers to BTRFS (end opinion).

(assertion, fud begins) But guess what? There is only one single developer on BTRFS. Oracle is not interested in BTRFS, now that they got the best: ZFS. Come on, do you really expect BTRFS is a serious attempt by Oracle? There is only ONE full time developer! Jesus. Who are you trying to fool? (end assertion, fud ends)



There is no mention to Chris Mason interview, there is a clear intention to undervalue btrfs development. There is no earlier message speaking about one full time developer and lot of other devs, there is no earlier message about Chris Mason interview. You obviously have no idea how btrfs development is going. So You fud.

Fud is not about lying intentionally, is more like spreading false information because of ignorance or disrespect about something.

[kebabbert]

You pointed that there was 1 dev, wanting to look it as it was an under development project.

Do you mean BTRFS is not under development? I must have missed that. When did Oracle release v1.0? Do you have links, or are you making this up?

Rephrase whatever you like.

I was quoting BTRFS main architect who said in an interview, he was the only one full time developer at Oracle. I am not making that up. If you think I lie about this, I am not. Again, I only write here what other, more credible people say. For instance, Linus T, Andrew Morton, SAP official benchmarks, BTRFS main architect, researchers, etc.

You arguments have nosense on a true open source project like btrfs. How many full time kernel dev has linux foundation and are payed by linux fundation?

I am not questioning if there are Linux developers. Why do you imply I question that?

I was only quoting BTRFS main developer who said he was the only full time developer at Oracle - if you think this is a lie and FUD - fine for you. But according to wikipedia, it is not FUD nor lies. And I also said that in my view point, if Oracle is really serious with selling a product, Oracle should dedicate a whole team, not a single developer (according to Chris Mason). How can you draw the conclusion I do FUD?!?!?! I do not FUD. If you continue to accuse me of FUDing, then it is you that FUDs and lies about me. Stop say I FUD, every assertion I did was true.

(Guesses and opinions are not FUD. False assertions are FUD. I never did false assertions. I only wrote opinions and guesses. Again: opinions are never wrong or FUD, but facts and assertions can be wrong or FUD).

[Jimbo]

You pointed that there was 1 dev, wanting to look it as it was an under development project. Rephrase whatever you like.

You arguments have nosense on a true open source project like btrfs. How many full time kernel dev has linux foundation and are payed by linux fundation?

[kebabbert]

more easy for intellects like you

"There is only one single developer on BTRFS"

I am refering to my earlier post on this; there is only one full time paid developer at Oracle.

After writing that sentence once, I refer to that sentence again, but only write down parts of the whole sentence. Are you playing dumb?

If you talk about Linux horizontal scalability, you sometimes only write "linux scalability" and you mean "Linux horizontal scalability" - but you do not write every single word. Everyone does that. It gets a pain to write down every single word in a long sentence, such as "one full time paid developer at Oracle working on BTRFS" - dont you think?

[kebabbert]

A 2008 opinion, even on 2008 otherdevs had said that this guy was worng, i posted you data, but obviously you have pointed that

http://lxer.com/module/newswire/lf/view/103802/

is lying.

You posted this link earlier, and I answered to your post. Did you not read my answer on this? Here is my answer on your link:
http://phoronix.com/forums/showpost....1&postcount=44

[Jimbo]

more easy for intellects like you

"There is only one single developer on BTRFS"

[kebabbert]

Kebabbert wrote:
"In my opinion, if Oracle really wants to bet on BTRFS, Oracle should have assigned a whole team of developers to BTRFS. But guess what? There is only one single developer on BTRFS. "

Which is totally fud, follow the links I posted, you could see that btrfs is activelly developed by a more than 1 dev, at least 2 or more from oracle, red hat, ibm...

How is that FUD? I read in the interview by the BTRFS main architect, he said he was the only full time paid developer at Oracle. That is not "a team". So, where do I FUD? Do you mean Chris Mason is not to be trusted in the interviews?

If you now want to rephrase yourself telling me that you pointed 1 full time payed dev by oracle go ahead, do whatever you want. But the reality is that you have pointed bad information, and someone really you and trusting you (it's hard to believe that someone does) can learn wrong data.

As I told you: I post information that I have read, from credible sources. This piece of information "one full time paid developer at Oracle on BTRFS" is from Chris Mason himself. Do you think he is not credible? Should I not trust him? Sorry I do not agree with your viewpoint in that case, I deem him credible. He said so, it is not FUD nor "bad information"

If you can prove there is a whole team of full time paid developers at Oracle, then you have disproved me and showed me wrong. If you can not prove there is a full time team, then maybe it is correct that only Chris Mason is full time paid developer at Oracle? Especially as he says so, himself. I think he knows more on who is working on BTRFS, than you?

[Jimbo]

This is not a guess. A Senior Storage expert says this. As other experts also says.

A 2008 opinion, even on 2008 otherdevs had said that this guy was worng, i posted you data, but obviously you have pointed that

http://lxer.com/module/newswire/lf/view/103802/

is lying.