Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Redox OS Making Progress On RISC-V Support, Eyes QEMU & Neovim Ports

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Redox OS Making Progress On RISC-V Support, Eyes QEMU & Neovim Ports

    Phoronix: Redox OS Making Progress On RISC-V Support, Eyes QEMU & Neovim Ports

    The Redox OS open-source Rust-written operating system project has published their September 2024 status update...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite

  • #2
    Love to see this project, I hope they can figure out how to make a micro kernel work well, and if not, have a good time while doing it.

    Comment


    • #3
      See!
      When the eunuchs create their own kernel, it's all good and there is no conflict.
      I wish them good luck in their own corner. Just leave others alone and stop swatting developers who refuse to switch to Rust. It's illegal anyway.
      Interestingly, the Microsoft employee, who tried to push Rust into Linux even harder, refuses to join Redox.

      Comment


      • #4
        I would love to see crosvm ported too, no super massive reason other then "rust + rust".

        Comment


        • #5
          hf_139 wrote:
          See! [...]
          Remember:
          Don't feed the troll.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Vorpal View Post
            Love to see this project, I hope they can figure out how to make a micro kernel work well, and if not, have a good time while doing it.
            According to the folks on this podcast episode, the whole industry has been misled about micro kernels versus monolithic kernels: https://oxide.computer/podcasts/oxid...friends/838559

            The story goes that there was an example micro kernel project with bad performance, and a paper was written that draws the conclusion that all micro kernels have performance problems, even though there are other examples of excellent micro kernels (e.g. L4, etc)

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by jokeyrhyme View Post

              According to the folks on this podcast episode, the whole industry has been misled about micro kernels versus monolithic kernels: https://oxide.computer/podcasts/oxid...friends/838559

              The story goes that there was an example micro kernel project with bad performance, and a paper was written that draws the conclusion that all micro kernels have performance problems, even though there are other examples of excellent micro kernels (e.g. L4, etc)
              L4 remains unproven in any industry and all performance expectations are unfounded

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by mobadboy View Post

                L4 remains unproven in any industry and all performance expectations are unfounded
                Don't miss the seL4 summit, in a week or two.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by ayumu View Post

                  Don't miss the seL4 summit, in a week or two.
                  no thanks

                  until i hold a device, it remains theoretical. i remember spending many hours trying to find an L4 microkernel OS to play with, and never found one.

                  meanwhile redox and helios just built their own. wonder why...........................................

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by hf_139 View Post
                    When the eunuchs create their own kernel, it's all good and there is no conflict.
                    The pot calling the kettle black : D

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X