Random question, can it load any semi-modern video driver yet for a GPU from AMD or Nvidia?
ReactOS 0.4.14 "Open-Source Windows" OS Brings Many Improvements
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by zexelon View PostRandom question, can it load any semi-modern video driver yet for a GPU from AMD or Nvidia?
Even if you manage to run it on bare metal on more than a decade old hardware, good luck not running into crashes, freezes, etc.
Comment
-
-
But seriously, with its current state and pace of development, I fail to understand who is ReactOS for. It looks like nothing but a hobby project by the developers for themselves. And it's not that I dislike small hobby operating systems or something. I think os like Haiku or others are pretty cool. But this? I just don't get the point of replicating an old version of Windows that barely can even run on bare metal of old hardware.Last edited by user1; 18 December 2021, 02:08 PM.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by user1 View PostBut seriously, with its current state and pace of development, I fail to understand who is ReactOS for. It looks like nothing but a hobby project by the developers for themselves.
Linux himself said:
“I’m doing a (free) operating system (just a hobby, won’t be big and professional like gnu) for 386(486) AT clones. [...]”
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by kpedersen View PostAs for the shell improvements, I am a little disappointed they are trying to make it look like Windows 10. Trying to chase these gimmicks will just waste time. However if they are enjoying theming it, then I suppose this is another thing entirely. Let them have their fun if that's what they're into
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by kpedersen View Post
Same was said about Linux many years ago.
Linux himself said:
As for the shell improvements, I am a little disappointed they are trying to make it look like Windows 10. Trying to chase these gimmicks will just waste time. However if they are enjoying theming it, then I suppose this is another thing entirely. Let them have their fun if that's what they're into
You're comparing apples and oranges. ReactOS has been in the works for literally decades (first released in 1998.) When Linux was released it was big within about 5-6 years and there was actually a unique need and use for it. There were no open source operating systems at that time.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Iridium View PostLess than 100MBytes to boot is definitely impressive, compared to modern OSes, but I think it’s a photo of how incomplete it is when compared to a full Linux Mint system running. If we run the strip-down game, you could try AROS, or its Icaros distro, the AmigaOS open source cousin, and boot in less than 16MBytes, GUI included, but what for?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by doragasu View Post
It's easy having a lower than 32 MiB memory footprint on Linux if you use a sane init environment (like procd from OpenWrt, and absolutely not systemd), Busybox and do not use a GUI. I have installed OpenWrt on many routers that have that amount of RAM (or even less in the past).
If you go to the usual stuff (systemd, coreutils, window environment), you can reach that footprint if you choose wisely. I.e. I have about 110 MiB RAM used on boot on my destktop PC using i3-wm (and without using a login manager). Some time ago, on a Samsung ARM Chromeboot, I had an Arch install using about 90 MiB RAM with LXDE and even with a login manager (lightdm).
Anyway I think optimizing 10 MiB of RAM seems a waste of time if later you are planning on opening things like an Internet Browser that will easily make the memory usage go above 1 GiB in an instant. If talking about ReactOS, I think it should be better spending time on making the USB stack work properly for example.
Comment
-
Comment