Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Benchmarks: FreeBSD 13 vs. NetBSD 9.2 vs. OpenBSD 7 vs. DragonFlyBSD 6 vs. Linux

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • TiberiusDuval
    replied
    Originally posted by therealbcook View Post
    Sorry for the seemingly ignorant question..

    Is there a reason for not including Fedora?

    Is Ubuntu just more recognized as a server OS?

    (I would think more people could come up with Fedora as a server than Clear..)

    Thanks in advance.
    Who would use Fedora for a server? I mean its kind of alpha version for RHEL....

    Leave a comment:


  • ksec
    replied
    Originally posted by phoronix View Post
    Phoronix: Benchmarks: FreeBSD 13 vs. NetBSD 9.2 vs. OpenBSD 7 vs. DragonFlyBSD 6 vs. Linux

    It's been a while since last having a hearty BSD benchmark comparison on Phoronix in part due to the latest hardware platforms generally lagging behind with how well supported they are by the various BSDs. But stemming from a Phoronix Premium supporter recently requesting some fresh BSD benchmarks, here is a look at how DragonFlyBSD 6.0.1, FreeBSD 13.0, NetBSD 9.2, and OpenBSD 7.0 are competing against various Linux distributions like CentOS, Clear Linux, and Ubuntu.

    https://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=30747
    I am wondering if there will be an update to this when FreeBSD 14, NetBSD 10, OpenBSD 7.4, along with latest version of DragonFly.

    Leave a comment:


  • grahamperrin
    replied
    Originally posted by Linuxxx View Post
    the ignore function doesn't even work
    The function does work as intended. Less noise. Down from nine pages, to three:

    Mqh1Arl.png

    Leave a comment:


  • grahamperrin
    replied
    Originally posted by aht0 View Post
    … works as a desktop just fine, …
    👍

    Focus area 1 of 4:

    Technology Roadmap | FreeBSD Foundation ◀ <https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/82120/>

    Leave a comment:


  • aht0
    replied
    It's even funnier it works as a desktop just fine, provided you take your time setting it up. Maybe 1h tops. Close enough Linux analogues would be Arch or Slackware. Also Gentoo if you like compiling your FreeBSD.
    Switchers from 'buntus expect their hands are held, GUI's would be there for their clicking and being given CLI just baffles the fuck out of them. Ergo.. "it sucks".. It's never them being stupid, its "OS being bad".

    Leave a comment:


  • Lewis Leaky
    replied
    It always makes me laugh when someone brings up that FreeBSD will never make it on the desktop. Well no duh! They're not trying to make it on the desktop, and RIGHTFULLY SO. What led us to switch to FreeBSD (5.1) is that they weren't losing their focus as a server OS, and they still aren't today. It has been an all around better experience; better performance, better stability, and MUCH better documentation.

    Unbelievable why there's always some "Joe Dumb Dumb" who switches from Ubuntu to FreeBSD and then whines when it's not like the OS he just came from.

    Leave a comment:


  • aht0
    replied
    Originally posted by Linuxxx View Post
    Third, if you BSD folks can't even counter my valid arguments, then sure, go ahead and ignore me.
    Countered basically your claim of "superior Linux 'gaming experience'". Somehow you had nothing to respond with. I got even curious what you'd try to come up with as in the way of Linux apologism because as an gaming platform on PC, compared to Windows, it just sucks.

    For rest of the things, if need be, we can just run Linux or multiple Linuces simultaneouslyu in FreeBSD jail and run anything we like and BSD doesn't support straight. Netflix-like DRM or whatever.

    There's also kernel translation layer for Linux syscalls. I am testing it out right now whether I can run Arma 3 linux game server off it. Binary itself works, I need to still test steamcmd utility. If not, I will just put it into separate Ubuntu or CentOS jail and be done. All without having to deal with Linux directly or play with it's various implementations made in insane asylum or corporate labs.

    Originally posted by Linuxxx View Post
    Just too bad about all the manpower that could have been spent much more wisely on Linux!
    Majority of contributors are huge enterprise entities and their paid minions. Private citizens contribute and have very little say. Even Linus's 'lieutenants' are enterprise-hires. Linux is basically corporate bitch these days and it's corporate "sugar-daddies" led by Red Hat basically dictate how big it "tits" what shape it's "butt" are. Might as well develop for Windows Server (laugh).

    Leave a comment:


  • onlyLinuxLuvUBack
    replied
    Originally posted by grahamperrin View Post

    Things got tough in that industry during lock-down. Look, what someone might do to earn a few extra pennies: <https://www.elle.com/uk/life-and-culture/a33822075/-/>
    I am forced to use windows how much worst could this be in comparison

    Leave a comment:


  • Linuxxx
    replied
    Originally posted by grahamperrin View Post
    Firstly, the ignore function doesn't even work in the first place!

    Secondly, you've got serious mental issues because you fantasize about becoming a gimp, as evident by the link to the article you posted earlier, therefore you should seek help immediately!

    Third, if you BSD folks can't even counter my valid arguments, then sure, go ahead and ignore me.
    Nevertheless, that won't save your kind from becoming completely irrevelant in the future anyway...

    Just too bad about all the manpower that could have been spent much more wisely on Linux!

    Have a great life!

    Leave a comment:


  • grahamperrin
    replied
    Originally posted by Linuxxx View Post
    … smelly … I'm …
    Et cetera.

    Last edited by grahamperrin; 16 December 2021, 01:05 AM.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X