Originally posted by tildearrow
View Post
Imagine a country that does something better than yours. It seems so obvious and feasible, but the people of your country likely prevent change.
Imagine a product you were excited about, maybe one that would spark a new technological era, but nobody wanted to buy it.
Imagine all the times you bought something that came with a feature you thought was a stupid gimmick, but ended up really liking it.
That's why I brought up the ribbon bar example, because that was a case of an improvement that seemingly the majority of people didn't like (at first), but it was actually an improvement, people just refused to acknowledge it.
The part where I draw the line is whether or not the change was necessary. Is the change entirely superficial? Does the change slow people down, even if they got used to it? Does the change cause regressions? These are the sorts of things where devs can become out-of-touch
Defying what the majority wants is often how you make progress.
Leave a comment: