DragonFlyBSD 6.0 Performance Is Looking Great - Initial Benchmarks

[Steffo]

Glad to see Dragonfly improving. As an old Amiga user and forever enthusiast I am glad that Dragonfly is out there. Glad to see a project that captures some of the thinking that the Amiga community was so known for.

Well, I'm not a fan of message passing, because it costs performance and memory. The programming language Rust shows, that is not necessary for security. And - btw. - Amiga hadn't protected memory as the article states.

[klapaucius]

Could you elaborate this statement?

Following on a link from Wikipedia, I found this old article.
For me, as a user, Amiga was great for its state of the art graphics and sound chips and its games

[Steffo]

Glad to see a project that captures some of the thinking that the Amiga community was so known for.

Could you elaborate this statement?

[waxhead]

Glad to see Dragonfly improving. As an old Amiga user and forever enthusiast I am glad that Dragonfly is out there. Glad to see a project that captures some of the thinking that the Amiga community was so known for.

[phoronix]

Phoronix: DragonFlyBSD 6.0 Performance Is Looking Great - Initial Benchmarks

This week DragonFlyBSD 6.0 was released and while I have just begun in my benchmarks of this new DragonFlyBSD release, the numbers so far are quite compelling for this BSD compared to its prior release.

https://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=30191