Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

seL4 Micro-Kernel Working Towards A General-Purpose, Multi-Server OS

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • brouhaha
    replied
    Originally posted by pal666 View Post
    all you have to do to get rid of this "misconception" is to provide microkernel, abi-compatible with linux, running just as fast. what was stopping you all those years?
    If a microkernel is ABI-compatible with the Linux kernel, then by definition it isn't actually a microkernel.

    Leave a comment:


  • brouhaha
    replied
    Originally posted by pal666 View Post
    will it save you from browser vulnerability? will you formally verify your browser?
    Will using synthetic oil in your car engine prevent your muffler from rusting out?

    Obviously having fewer kernel bugs doesn't solve all problems in other system components, but that doesn't mean that it's not worthwhile to use a kernel with fewer bugs.

    Leave a comment:


  • zxy_thf
    replied
    Originally posted by waxhead View Post
    I might be crashing the party ,but how about Minix 3 as an alternative?!
    I don't think Minix has any chance.
    L4 family is already the Top 3, if not Top 1, widely deployed operating system, used by base stations, all iOS devices, etc.

    Leave a comment:


  • V1tol
    replied
    Originally posted by wkleunen View Post
    seL4 is a really nice project, i don't understand why google is redeveloping a microkernel with Fuchsia, when such a well tested microkernel is readily available.
    NIH syndrome. Actually Linux suffers from it too (except for kernel)

    Leave a comment:


  • wkleunen
    replied
    seL4 is a really nice project, i don't understand why google is redeveloping a microkernel with Fuchsia, when such a well tested microkernel is readily available.

    Leave a comment:


  • pal666
    replied
    Originally posted by pabloski View Post
    The big problem is that the community ( especially the opensource one ) sees microkernels as slow. It is a big misconception
    all you have to do to get rid of this "misconception" is to provide microkernel, abi-compatible with linux, running just as fast. what was stopping you all those years?

    Leave a comment:


  • pal666
    replied
    Originally posted by brouhaha View Post
    The advantage of seL4 over other microkernels is that seL4 is formally verified
    will it save you from browser vulnerability? will you formally verify your browser?

    Leave a comment:


  • pal666
    replied
    This multi-server OS would be secure, support a range of use-cases and security policies, and perform comparable to monolithic systems
    in a dream

    Leave a comment:


  • brouhaha
    replied
    Originally posted by waxhead View Post
    I might be crashing the party ,but how about Minix 3 as an alternative?!
    The advantage of seL4 over other microkernels is that seL4 is formally verified. It has been mathematically proven to meet its specification, including enforcement of security properties. The proof is done both at the C code level and at the object code (compiler output) level. There is no other real-world kernel which has been formally verified.

    Leave a comment:


  • pabloski
    replied
    Originally posted by waxhead View Post
    I might be crashing the party ,but how about Minix 3 as an alternative?!
    Minix has been used as a desktop OS by hobbyists. It is used in the Intel ME. It has some nice features ( like dead servers restart ). Imho Minix is better positioned to go forward. The big problem is that the community ( especially the opensource one ) sees microkernels as slow. It is a big misconception, but very hard to die.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X