Originally posted by kravemir
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
It's Official But Sad: TrueOS Is Over As Once The Best Desktop BSD OS
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Awesomeness View Post
For specific tasks the performance might be better for FreeBSD. For other tasks Linux is better. OpenBSD has tighter security vetting than most Linux distributions.
And, security vetting of what, kernel or packages?
Comment
-
Originally posted by kravemir View Post
What makes BSD better compared Linux? What would user, currently using Ubuntu (LTS, or Debian, or Fedora,...), gain by switching to BSD?
For the average desktop user, there isn't much to gain and a lot to lose if they play games.
IMHO, BSD's benefits are more of a technical nature and most, if not all, of them are replicated on Linux to some extent -- a fine example is how FreeBSD is a core system and then you add stuff to it to make it your system, that isn't much different than an Arch or Ubuntu minimal install followed by adding stuff to it to make it your system. (Free)BSD does the whole core integrated system better, but outside of that you'll run into the same issues Linux has where there's a lot of ways to do the same things so tight integration starts going by the wayside as more and more things are added to the system.
From there it just depends on either what benchmarks better, if licensing matters, and more technical things like file system features (ZFS/Hammer2/BTRFS/LVM+???)....stuff more in the realm of a sys admin designing a workflow and not a user using a workflow that's presented to them.
Comment
-
I have NomadBSD running on an old Dell Inspiron, and it much runs faster and more stable than any of the 'lightweight' Linux distros such as PepperMint. It can also run on a usb, and in that scenario, it's light years ahead of Puppy. I haven't had to reboot that PC in over a month, where linux was rebooting daily, at the very least.
I have GhostBSD installed on my new ZenBook, dual booting with Windows10 in a ZFS partition. No SystemD, either. I used to have Ubuntu installed there -- it was noticably slower than Windows, and DBus was not stable. I was always rebooting. Now I only reboot to use Windows.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by kravemir View Post
What makes BSD better compared Linux? What would user, currently using Ubuntu (LTS, or Debian, or Fedora,...), gain by switching to BSD?
Other things I like to play with this on this laptop are bhyve and jails. Again, both have equivalents in Linux with KVM and LXC/Docker.
At first I just thought I'd try FreeBSD for a few months on this laptop and when it got annoying or if I needed to do some real work where I usually use Linux, I'll just switch it up. But everything just works. I do PHP, Python and some Java development on it, I have jails set up for my apps for each framework just not to have one big cluttered mess. Godot engine works fine, so I can do some game development (something I'm just poking around in, not an expert in the field by any stretch) and everything is just as stable as on my main Gentoo desktop.
So yea, to answer your question, there is no real gain in anything I do on it, everything I do on FreeBSD can be done on Linux. But it works well, I like the community and support, so I recommend it. But I love Gentoo and their community too, so I'm not picking one over the other, both Linux and BSD rock!
- Likes 5
Comment
-
Originally posted by kpedersen View PostYes, that is what Windows users have been saying for years about Linux. Sounded just as naive as your statement
Open-source software can never die. Even TrueOS can be forked and maintained
Even if it would be forked and maintained, who would use OS that supports hardware from up to 2007 (+ some individual newer network cards)?
- Likes 1
Comment
-
TrueBSD was hampered by FreeBSD's lack of timely support for reasonably up-to-date desktop or laptop hardware. Its server support was always pretty much first rate because that's what the majority of its user base was using it for. I'm not surprised to see TrueBSD close shop.
Lack of modern peripheral support is something a few of the FreeBSD developers have finally realized and trying remedy, but I do wonder if it's really just not enough. OpenBSD is good on newish laptops (excluding lack of support for TRIM ops) because that's a what a lot of its devs are using, especially Thinkpads. It's great that Netflix and other server companies are supporting FreeBSD, but it doesn't have nearly the same developer base on the desktop and workstation side as Linux and the various Linux distributions. Compared to the various packaging systems with the Linux distros, ports and pkg are primitive and annoying to deal with. This limits its appeal to those that aren't constantly tinkering with the underlying software and just want to get on with doing they're actual work.
Just my two cents worth.
I like FreeBSD as a server OS, but it frankly sucks for a desktop for many people.
Comment
-
Comment