Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

GNU Hurd Hardware Support Remains In Very Rough Shape For 2018

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • GNU Hurd Hardware Support Remains In Very Rough Shape For 2018

    Phoronix: GNU Hurd Hardware Support Remains In Very Rough Shape For 2018

    Yesterday at FOSDEM 2018 Hurd developer Samuel Thibault talked about the work done on this GNU kernel for a PCI arbiter to allow different user-land drivers to access PCI devices concurrently. During this PCI arbiter talk he also went over the current state of the hardware support and recent achievements for GNU Hurd...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite

  • #2
    Not directed at Michael but ... Why would anybody care about GNU Hurd?

    Comment


    • #3
      Everytime I read it's name, it goes like:
      GNU Hurt

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by EricBlair View Post
        Not directed at Michael but ... Why would anybody care about GNU Hurd?
        Why not? A FOSS microkernel developed by the FSF. It has a ton of problems, but at the very least it's interesting.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by EricBlair View Post
          Not directed at Michael but ... Why would anybody care about GNU Hurd?
          In 2018 GNU Hurd should be a viable alternative to [GNU] Linux.

          Comment


          • #6
            WolfpackN64 it could be interesting if it had any chance of being more than a research project.

            onicsis I'd be interested to hear how you define viable :-)

            Comment


            • #7
              Does it do x64 yet?

              Comment


              • #8
                How does any project stay in pre-alpha for 28 years

                Comment


                • #9

                  onicsis I'd be interested to hear how you define viable :-)
                  Well, Linux represent a viable way to get the job done. Or at least many jobs. First of all to boot on many hardware without to many issues. Second to run a more than decent WMs+basic applications, usable by average users. This when targeting desktops. + Specialised categories of software.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by bachchain View Post
                    How does any project stay in pre-alpha for 28 years
                    Unfortunately there weren't to many attempts to fork it.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X