Originally posted by Master5000
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
What Windows 10 vs. Linux Benchmarks Would You Like To See?
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by Master5000 View PostBenchmarking is pointless. Windows has won. Yet again. I already have Windows 10 and it's the best OS ever. Way better than Windows 8.1 and waaaay above anything the Linux amateurs have ever done. Well done Microsoft!
Comment
-
Originally posted by humbug View PostI think the problem is low RAM usage doesn't indicate good optimization. A lot of people are too obsessed with it.
Windows will cache a lot of non-critical stuff into RAM but that doesn't mean it's heavy. It will unload that stuff if another application requires the RAM.
I am curious to if this is fixed... I used (shrug) Windows XP at work and it performed quite well actually. After "up"grading to Windows 7 on the exact same hardware everything is dead slow (regardless of any tweaks) and for some reason everybody is claiming that Windows 7 is fast. I ponder if the above have been fixed. But generally using RAM for something is always better and faster than using it for nothing so I could not agree more with your comment there. Too many do not understand the benefit of caching stuff, but if what I wrote is actually true then it do understand why people think using less ram is a good thing
http://www.dirtcellar.net
Comment
-
Initial Windows 10 benchmarks vs. Fedora Linux - http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag...iris6200&num=1
Michael Larabel
https://www.michaellarabel.com/
Comment
-
I'll second the disk I/O benchmarks - I've often heard it said that Windows has much slower file access than Linux (e.g. cmake has a cache that is only used in Windows for this reason), so it would be interesting to see if Win10 improves on this and how it compares to Linux (with both NTFS and ext4 tested under Linux).
Comment
Comment