Good evening folks!
Seeing the daily (and per-commit) Phoromatic Tracker benchmarks for the kernel has made me think that it would be nice - or, dare I say, awesome even - to have something similar, a per-commit (or perhaps just daily) benchmarking, for the r600c/r600g drivers, perhaps compared to fglrx. So we'd have results like these: http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag...00g_q410&num=1 only for every commit to mesa (and drm too?) - if resources allow it, if not then only daily.
xorg-edgers updated their packages a couple of days ago, and I just ran a new benchmark of nexuiz and the FPS has increased by 5.5% since the last version of the drivers:
I just think it'd be really cool to have this functionality in the Tracker. Are there any reasons - technical, financial, or otherwise - that this hasn't been done yet? One I can think of is the energy usage, which I suspect would be quite a bit higher - ie. Radeoon HD 4870 vs. an intel Atom CPU.
Seeing the daily (and per-commit) Phoromatic Tracker benchmarks for the kernel has made me think that it would be nice - or, dare I say, awesome even - to have something similar, a per-commit (or perhaps just daily) benchmarking, for the r600c/r600g drivers, perhaps compared to fglrx. So we'd have results like these: http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag...00g_q410&num=1 only for every commit to mesa (and drm too?) - if resources allow it, if not then only daily.
xorg-edgers updated their packages a couple of days ago, and I just ran a new benchmark of nexuiz and the FPS has increased by 5.5% since the last version of the drivers:
I just think it'd be really cool to have this functionality in the Tracker. Are there any reasons - technical, financial, or otherwise - that this hasn't been done yet? One I can think of is the energy usage, which I suspect would be quite a bit higher - ie. Radeoon HD 4870 vs. an intel Atom CPU.
Comment