Phoromatic Tracker Launches To Monitor Linux Performance

[daikerjohn]

I have plenty of hardware that I have access to and want to throw into the test farm, but so far i haven't done that yet as I am just trying to conserve electricity and keep the recurring operating costs of it low until Phoromatic / Phoromatic Tracker is being sponsored by any company/organization(s) or is otherwise self-sustainable.



Sure, if you want. Setup process is easy. If you're running Ubuntu I can send you some scripts to use a PPA otherwise if you are another distribution and have an auto-build procedure for it daily then I can tell you just how to easily set the Phoronix Test Suite to connect into this Phoromatic test farm and to begin the testing.

It's currently running Ubuntu 9.10 Netbook Remix, but that can be changed to a default 9.10 install if needed. I'd love your scripts, as I don't currently have anything capable of daily auto-building.

[Michael]

Michael,

Was wondering when you anticipate getting more systems added to the kernel tracker? I see the 32-bit Atom system, and wondered specifically when we can expect to see a 'moderately performant' 64-bit dual/quad core in the mix?

I have plenty of hardware that I have access to and want to throw into the test farm, but so far i haven't done that yet as I am just trying to conserve electricity and keep the recurring operating costs of it low until Phoromatic / Phoromatic Tracker is being sponsored by any company/organization(s) or is otherwise self-sustainable.

I've a 32-bit Athlon XP system sitting around what I would gladly volunteer as an additional system to the kernel-tracker. If you're interested, let me know.

Sure, if you want. Setup process is easy. If you're running Ubuntu I can send you some scripts to use a PPA otherwise if you are another distribution and have an auto-build procedure for it daily then I can tell you just how to easily set the Phoronix Test Suite to connect into this Phoromatic test farm and to begin the testing.

[daikerjohn]

Additional systems for kernel-tracker

Michael,

Was wondering when you anticipate getting more systems added to the kernel tracker? I see the 32-bit Atom system, and wondered specifically when we can expect to see a 'moderately performant' 64-bit dual/quad core in the mix?

I've a 32-bit Athlon XP system sitting around what I would gladly volunteer as an additional system to the kernel-tracker. If you're interested, let me know.

[Michael]

This is fantastic! However, plotting error bars on the charts would greatly increase the value of this output. If the error bars are too small, some indication of Standard Deviation or Coefficient of Variance would be useful.

PTS will automatically increase the run count if the std threshold exceeds 3.5% and some additional information is available when running analyze-all-runs on a result file, but that is not exposed through the Phoromatic Tracker interface. If anyone is interested in helping out with stats support or providing any other guidance on the matter I am happy to push more stats support in there, that's just not an area that is my forte.

[Nexus6]

Needs error bars!

This is fantastic! However, plotting error bars on the charts would greatly increase the value of this output. If the error bars are too small, some indication of Standard Deviation or Coefficient of Variance would be useful.

[birdie]

And, Michael, thank you very much for your work!

[zoomblab]

This is a great tool. I hope linux companies to support your efforts.

[Garp]

Congratulations, I'm sure a significant amount of work has gone into this, and it certainly looks very useful.

Wonder what the change was on the 13th that caused such a spiked improvement.

[Michael]

Also, I've got a question, will you create the appropriate bug reports in the Linux kernel bugzilla?

For some of the larger performance regressions it may be likely, but not for all of them; I simply don't have the time unless some company is interested in sponsoring that work.

[birdie]

The text in the second lower part of the http://www.phoromatic.com/ is all blue - that's very misleading. Please, change its color to something neutral, as blue is the color of web links.

Also, I've got a question, will you create the appropriate bug reports in the Linux kernel bugzilla? Just showing the results to the community is kinda worthless.