Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
They Say A Picture Is Worth A Thousand Words
Collapse
X
-
I'm concerned about the relevance of windows tests if a compatibility layer like cygwin is used.
I think a such issue could easily deserve PTS' credibility in the benchmarking (small) world more than a windows version could serve PTS.
Leave a comment:
-
When I saw the news title I was secretly hoping it's new shots from UT3. But, interesting news nevertheless!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by b15hop View PostTrue, because WinXP is still favoured over Vista. From what I can see, Win7 and Vista are very similar... Even though people are raving about the new Win7.Last edited by kraftman; 06 November 2009, 04:41 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
how many of the tests depend on cygwin?
I fear that most of the tests depend on cygwin, so it's that what gets tested and not raw win7. There should be at least an option to disable these tests.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by bogdanbiv View PostWhat about older Windowses (XP mostly, not Vista)? Is there something in PTS tying it to a specific version of windows? I tend to believe that XP is still important for most people - even on new systems.
I think having support for all computing platforms helps PTS to pick up more steam. For example OEMs could use it for checking performance of their products.
Leave a comment:
-
Support for older Windows versions
What about older Windowses (XP mostly, not Vista)? Is there something in PTS tying it to a specific version of windows? I tend to believe that XP is still important for most people - even on new systems.
I think having support for all computing platforms helps PTS to pick up more steam. For example OEMs could use it for checking performance of their products.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by d2globalinc View PostI got a very sick feeling when seeing that damn logo and images on Phoronix.. It's too bright and hurts my eyes.. I don't know whats worse, the windows logo or the internet explorer one..
- D2G
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: