Announcing PTS Desktop Live 2009.3

[Michael]

Yes I didn't realise the first time I read too, that's why I posted when I understood XD

Because installing etc.. all the stuff is quite annoying just for a few tests.

Was having "Live" in the title not clear enough?

[bridgman]

It just hit me that this is a "live" distribution, which makes it *very* useful indeed. Thanks for all the hard work that went into this.

[dl.zerocool]

PTS Desktop Live will NOT have a 32-bit spin. All of the hardware we are targeting to support is 64-bit capable.



It's already done through the reference system comparison functionality, just not with some base index.



This has long been done through Phoronix Global...

Since all hardware getting out in the futur will be 64bitz capable so distributions as windows and mac should go to 64bit versions only.

This would solve lots of problems with drivers and would force the migration.

[Michael]

Isn't there a worse performance if you test on a live-cd environment compared to a installed operating system?

May provide some benchmarks of comparing live vs. disk in the coming days.

[Michael]

32 bit version too would be a great idea.

PTS Desktop Live will NOT have a 32-bit spin. All of the hardware we are targeting to support is 64-bit capable.

And to put a computer (perhaps a brand can sponsor it) as a reference in all tests (100, 1000 or any number) then each test can be referenced to a specific machine. other way of making this is to put several brand machines as Apple , Dell, Asus, Lenovo, or HP ones, and the ability to set any of them as base 1000 index.

It's already done through the reference system comparison functionality, just not with some base index.

And of course a combined test number as 3dmark or future mark test and a web page where upload and compare our results, then there some advertisements.

This has long been done through Phoronix Global...

[dl.zerocool]

Isn't there a worse performance if you test on a live-cd environment compared to a installed operating system?

Once the system is loaded, everything is on ram so normaly no, if things are done correctly being on a CD or HD doesn't matter, but I don't know how they manage to make sql tests etc on the HD

[dl.zerocool]

Awesome. very good to have a live test distribution :P

[mitcoes]

some machine as index and 32bit version too.

32 bit version too would be a great idea.

There are 2 ways actually, small computers for business, and web, and super 64bit computers for hardgamers and miniservers.

Linux is faster in low cost computers, and is less used as desktop system in gamers computers, because Dx is beating Ogl and MS WOS graphic drivers are better than X-Windows ones, even in opengl.

And to put a computer (perhaps a brand can sponsor it) as a reference in all tests (100, 1000 or any number) then each test can be referenced to a specific machine. other way of making this is to put several brand machines as Apple , Dell, Asus, Lenovo, or HP ones, and the ability to set any of them as base 1000 index.

And of course a combined test number as 3dmark or future mark test and a web page where upload and compare our results, then there some advertisements.

[VinzC]

Well, 2GB at a minimum... Probably the first test suite for supercomputers...

:lol:

[bugmenot]

Isn't there a worse performance if you test on a live-cd environment compared to a installed operating system?