Michael Could you perhaps test installing ccache on Fedora 28 to confirm the compiler reporting behavior with PTS?
I believe ccache was installed when I installed the "C Development Tools and Libraries" group of packages. (dnf group install "C Development Tools and Libraries")
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Why doesn't PTS system-info see GCC?
Collapse
X
-
Removing ccache from the PATH works! Isn't ccache installed by default? What could be messing up my system?
Maybe unrelated, but I also noticed that some benchmarks are way off from the reference results for the same CPU. Eg. on my 2700X smallpt takes ~45 seconds while the reference is ~12s. But if I run PTS in docker it's 13s.
Leave a comment:
-
I uninstalled Clang to see if that would remove some conflict. Still no GCC:
Code:OPERATING SYSTEM: Fedora 28 Kernel: 4.17.18-200.fc28.x86_64 (x86_64) Desktop: MATE 1.20.2 Compiler: LLVM 6.0.1 + CUDA 9.1 Security: SELinux + __user pointer sanitization + Full AMD retpoline IBPB Protection
Leave a comment:
-
Not to my knowledge.
Code:$ $PATH bash: /usr/lib64/ccache:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/home/[USER]/.local/bin:/home/[USER]/bin: No such file or directory
Leave a comment:
-
No issues here on Fedora 28 with the same GCC build... Did you change your PATH with anything odd or anything of that like?
Leave a comment:
-
Why doesn't PTS system-info see GCC?
With phoronix test suite v7.8.0 and v8.0.1, system-info shows:
Code:OPERATING SYSTEM: Fedora 28 Kernel: 4.17.18-200.fc28.x86_64 (x86_64) Desktop: MATE 1.20.2 Display Server: X Server 1.19.6 Compiler: Clang 6.0.1 + LLVM 6.0.1 + CUDA 9.1 Security: SELinux + __user pointer sanitization + Full AMD retpoline IBPB + SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp Protection
Code:$ gcc --version gcc (GCC) 8.1.1 20180712 (Red Hat 8.1.1-5)
Tags: None
Leave a comment: