Originally posted by TheLexMachine
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Skylake & Newer Could Still See Faster Linux Graphics Performance
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by caligula View Post
Well, stores still sell 7x0 series cards for HTPC users. 1030 is pretty recent model for fanless HTPC use.
Comment
-
Originally posted by TheLexMachine View Post
The 700 and 1000 low-end and mid-range cards are priced about the same, so nobody in their right mind would even consider the remaining stock of the older cards when the newer cards are available and are a more sensible upgrade option due to the latest HDMI and DP to go along with the newer video codecs and APIs.
Comment
-
Originally posted by caligula View PostHow about the driver support (nouveau)? 1030 has good support for hw video decoding? Higher TDP might be a problem too.
Afaik the 730 works fine after you extract hw decoding firmware from blob https://nouveau.freedesktop.org/wiki/VideoAcceleration/
and it is a GF108 so a NVC0 in this feature list https://nouveau.freedesktop.org/wiki/FeatureMatrix/ (still no power management, not good for a fanless card)
With NVIDIA driver both work great afaik (no duh), and we both know most people that buy NVIDIA cards will use the blob, so all things considered (both are bad with noveau AND good with NVIDIA's blob) I echo his "nobody in their right mind would even consider the remaining stock of the older cards".
Comment
-
Originally posted by caligula View Post
How about the driver support (nouveau)? 1030 has good support for hw video decoding? Higher TDP might be a problem too.
Comment
-
Originally posted by TheLexMachine View PostThe 1000-series is energy-efficient and has lower power consumption and all that, in comparison to the 700-series, so it's the only way to go, if you are okay with using Nvidia's drivers. If you aren't, then you are stuck with older cards, like the 700-series.
Comment
-
Originally posted by caligula View Post
710 has a TDP of 19W while 1030 has 30W. My experience tells that cards with larger TDP always have larger consumption in all situations.
Comment
-
Originally posted by TheLexMachine View Post
Comparing the 710 to the 1030 is just nonsense. You have to compare the 730 to the 1030 and if you did, you'd see that the 1030 is more efficient and consumes around the same amount of power with better performance and higher speeds. Unless you're skull-fucking the GPU with some sort of benchmark or gaming process - neither of which anyone with these cards is going to be doing - the TDP means nothing, since cards don't come near it unless pushed. On Windows, the power draw of a 1030 is going to be around 8-18 watts, depending on what you are doing within the boundaries of everyday use. If you locked the card into power-saving, it might be a bit lower. As for whether or not the card will perform the same on Linux, that's up in the air, because we all know that driver updates and other things tend to make real-world performance a bit difficult to pin down on Linux.
Comment
-
I don't think there is any real-world scenario with modern hardware - anything from the last 10 years or so - where a user would have to work within a power budget. Certainly not in the HTPC realm where hardware choices are almost always going to be energy-efficient and quiet, except for madVR HTPCs, which operate under different rules and designs than regular HTPCs and they certainly have no power budget because they are supposed to have high-end GPUs, if afforded. If you were using an SFF desktop, there would be a thermal budget, due to airflow and heat retention, but not a power budget, because those systems are always designed with the possibility of low-end video cards being installed.
Comment
Comment