If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Intel Core i7 6800K Benchmarks On Ubuntu + Linux 4.8
There's good evidence that electrostatic discharge (ESD) damage may not show up immediately but can take some time. When the manufacturer subsequently looks at a failed part under a microscope, they see that the ESD caused some damage to the semiconductor around the wire bonding point, which then progresses to a failure due to thermal cycling stress, or electromigration effects.
So if you find you get failed components for no good reason, quite a while after building or working on the computer, it could be the latent ESD damage.
Now, you might ask "don't these components have some anti-static protection", and yes they try and protect them, BUT, when you consider the signal frequencies - many gigahertz (a 2GHz square wave has odd harmonics so there will be 10GHz components) - it's hard to block the spikey ESD pulses without "damaging" the signals.
humm.. how can some test run better with lower speed ram ? is there any explanation why ddr 2133 can do better than the very same with dd 2400 or do i miss read some test ?
Michael : why are the test results "reversed"?
We now have better systems at the bottom and slowest at top... added to the smallest "Lower is better" possible it it really, really misleading...
Interresting results anyway.
humm.. how can some test run better with lower speed ram ? is there any explanation why ddr 2133 can do better than the very same with dd 2400 or do i miss read some test ?
Possibly because 2133 has lower latency which is more important in some tests.
OpenBenchmarking.org, Phoronix Test Suite, Linux benchmarking, automated benchmarking, benchmarking results, benchmarking repository, open source benchmarking, benchmarking test profiles
It is mobile processor, one year older than i7-6800k with lower turbo speed (3.5GHz vs 3.6 GHz), lower cache (6MB vs 15MB) and for some tests my CPU is winner and for some tests the results are almost the same. I cannot fully explain it to me - maybe it shows, that new processors have only slight performance grow (which is not good and maybe it shows, that there is almost no difference between desktop vs mobile processors in case of speed of core.
What do you think about this?
Comment