Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

It Looks Like Canonical Will Soon Publish Vulkan Mir Support On Mesa

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • It Looks Like Canonical Will Soon Publish Vulkan Mir Support On Mesa

    Phoronix: It Looks Like Canonical Will Soon Publish Vulkan Mir Support On Mesa

    We've been waiting to see Vulkan on Mir after the developers working on this display server for Ubuntu missed their original Ubuntu 16.04 target but the latest chatter indicates we might be seeing the support materialize soon...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite

  • #2
    Why do Mesa and Mir need special support to get Vulkan running on Mir, when it works on Wayland from Day 1?
    https://www.collabora.com/about-us/b...t-for-wayland/

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by blackout23 View Post
      Why do Mesa and Mir need special support to get Vulkan running on Mir, when it works on Wayland from Day 1?
      https://www.collabora.com/about-us/b...t-for-wayland/

      Because Canonical just couldn't keep out of the compositor protocol game. If they would work together, or at least with the same protocol, they would be shipping by now.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by microcode View Post


        Because Canonical just couldn't keep out of the compositor protocol game. If they would work together, or at least with the same protocol, they would be shipping by now.
        Canonical wants to be the new micro$oft. They are trying so hard.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by cj.wijtmans View Post
          Canonical wants to be the new micro$oft. They are trying so hard.
          It's not like the Wayland team is a bunch of cavalier programmers trying to help the greater good. It's backed by IBM and Red Hat, which are bigger corporations than Canonical.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by tegs View Post

            It's not like the Wayland team is a bunch of cavalier programmers trying to help the greater good. It's backed by IBM and Red Hat, which are bigger corporations than Canonical.
            but did IBM and red hat install spyware into their OS like Canonical did with ubuntu/unity?

            Comment


            • #7
              Honestly they should have continued upstart since systemd just likes to absorb everything and become a memory hog with its logging "journal" system and ditched Mir for wayland... everyone would have won. But no they do opposite.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by cj.wijtmans View Post
                Honestly they should have continued upstart since systemd just likes to absorb everything and become a memory hog with its logging "journal" system and ditched Mir for wayland... everyone would have won. But no they do opposite.
                This article has nothing to do with systemd so please crawl back to your Veteran Unix Admin ® cave and complain there. Plus what you say makes no sense as they would also have to swim against the current and waste resources should they have kept developing upstart in the same way than the Mir vs Wayland story.

                Anyways good luck to them for convincing Mesa to upstream and maintain a Mir-specific codepath.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by cj.wijtmans View Post
                  but did IBM and red hat install spyware into their OS like Canonical did with ubuntu/unity?

                  "Spyware"... lol.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    PS: Please remove this "unapproved" bullshit. This is getting out of hand.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X