Firefox Developers Still Hesitant About Using EGL Over GLX On X11 Linux

[DanL]

I am dungeon. I maked comprehension hard ever

[dungeon]

It's Caesar (notice the spelling) and you're still spewing gibberish. maded? Either you need a better translator or you need to work on your communication skills.

I don't care about name of major falsificator of time nor his prose

Even his own knew how much he was wrong and he get what he deserved as they killed him 2 years after that, obviosly not for nothing

[starshipeleven]

Oh I know, there is no difference

Yes there is. A protocol is "born" when it becomes stable so you count age from the time it was declared stable.

Today you can ask NASA, and they will tell you that was major falsificate of time in human history and that older ones where more correct as they aligh to the electromagnetic changes of the Sun

Quit this crap. Calendar is not related to electromagnetic changes in the sun.

Calendar was adjusted many times because one solar year (= a full rotation of Earth around the Sun) is not 365 days, but 365.24219.
That's because the day's duration is caused by the rotation of the Earth on its own axis, which is completely unrelated to the rotation of the Earth around the sun, so (of course) they don't really match particularly well.

As civilizations noticed the duration of their "365-day year" was not perfect they adjusted their calendars to stay closer to the real value. This was very important for them as calendar was used to decide when plant or when harvest food crops, and if your calendar is shifted by weeks or even months because all the 0.24219 adds up over time, it all goes to crap.

[tildearrow]

It's a pity how Mozilla supports Linux... GPU acceleration disabled by default, EGL not supported by build, touchscreen scrolling doesn't work by default and yes Wayland support seems to be a one man show.

What about Rust?

(by the way, why not emoji for the smilies?)

[dungeon]

I am dungeon. I maked comprehension hard ever

Happy 10th B-Day to Wayland . That might be majorly used maybe after his teenage period, so after recieving all needed vaccines

Contact Winkipedia, if you are of Ceaser-blood so wanna change timings as you like That also says:

30 September 2008

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waylan...er_protocol%29

[starshipeleven]

Happy 10th B-Day to Wayland . That might be majorly used maybe after his teenage period

Contact Winkipedia, if you are of Ceaser-blood so wanna change timings as you like That also says:


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waylan...er_protocol%29

That's "initial release", not "first stable release".

[dungeon]

That's "initial release", not "first stable release".

So King can't be a King even after initialisation if he is not "married" stabilisation? So once he get married we started counting that he is a King or before he was just a prince?

That way it isn't released yet, since he is not a King still of majority... after teenage period he might be

[Vistaus]

WebExtensions is designed as a superset of the Chrome API and, modulo the bits Mozilla is still working to get implemented, Chrome cripples extensions more than Firefox does.

(eg. Quirks of how Firefox internals handle downloads make it a major rearchitecting project to implement an onDeterminingFilename event which runs after the site-suggested filename is known but before the download starts, but Chrome lacks the webRequest.StreamFilter API, which is necessary to properly implement something like NoScript with the capability to rewrite the incoming HTTP response before the browser starts to act on it.)

Beyond that, Chrome has no userChrome.css that you can use to re-create most of the tweaks offered in Classic Theme Restorer.

Chrome doesn't have a userChrome.css file but Vivaldi, based on Chromium, has two files (custom.css and custom.js) to create a lot of interface tweaks.

[starshipeleven]

So King can't be a King even after initialisation if he is not "married" stabilisation? So once he get married we started counting that he is a King or before he was just a prince?

you couldn't become a king without a crowning ceremony (a formal event with all nobles invited) and usually having reached an age limit so you're not seen as a child anymore. This is similar to a protocol that reaches official stable release.

Marriage might be required or not depending on your descent (and the kingdom's rules), if you are already a son of the last king or a close relative you don't need marriage, if you are not then you might need to marry the daughter of the last king (or the closest relative) first.

And yes, until the crowning ceremony a son/daugher of a king are called prince or princess, not kings or queens. Many sons and daughers of kings never became kings or queens because they were the second, third or fourth child, and remained princes or princesses all their life.

Afaik in UK they changed the "default" rules so that a Queen marrying a man does not automatically make him a King, he becomes just a "prince consort" (i.e. he has limited political power while the queen is the one in command, while in standard monarchies a king usually has more power than the queen).

[nanonyme]

So King can't be a King even after initialisation if he is not "married" stabilisation? So once he get married we started counting that he is a King or before he was just a prince?

That way it isn't released yet, since he is not a King still of majority... after teenage period he might be

In the good old days your kingship was also subject to questioning until you produced a heir, whether you were crowned and married or not. How does this reflect with graphics protocols?