Wow very Clever to insult and blame the community, when you need the community to work with you in gnome and other projects.
I wonder if he is just a troll or if that is his strategy. Insulting people then sending them patches, they react very uncooperative, and then he can say: See I told you so that are asholes.
self-fullfilling prophesies.
Some investors forced him to do that move, else he would have stubbern tried to make that stuff work till the end of time. Thats what I hear from that bitter words.
He even startet forking gnome before gnome 3 even existed, so his claim that that was only a reaction to the gnome team is false, except he tried to push convergence on gnome 2. But than that would be his fault, I would not want to push I dont know VR on Windows 3.11.
I also dont belive he ever send a patch related to convergence, he shurly refered to general patches to gnome not specific to that..
Why is he such a sissy, just use the same base and libs and some infrastructure, cinnamon does that, and they dont whine about it, they just do it and have good success with it.
But therefor you would have to commit to desktop but you will push everything but desktop.
I am shure that when purism releases their gnome-phone they already talked about, it will be Mark that says look they finaly did what I told them to do. When such small company can make that work together WITH the community, you wonder how bad canonical is, if they dont get it to work.
Why doesnt he try to fork for real the linux kernel (not some small patches a real fork) and look what then happens, even companies like intel or even microsoft know that you have to get your shit in the official kernel tree or else it really really sucks. So even this much bigger companies know that they have to work WITH the community, maybe MS should send canonical a email to explain them that.
Also its not so much about WHAT they did, but HOW they did it. The FUD against wayland, the refusal of work of a developer of compiz they made belive that that work is needed, the spyware activated by default, the money steal action with that music-software, also how long did it take till a real gnome-shell blend of ubuntu was there? 3 years?
some users here even talk about gnome 3 was forced on users? Really? did the gnome team somehow restrict ubuntu or other distros to ship gnome2 alternative or exclusive? aperently not. But gnome forced unity on their users, at the end I had to deinstall unity and use 2 ppas to get a not even complete gnome 3 in ubuntu.
They activly fighted against gnome, using their market power, like preinstall internet explorer and give the user no other choice. Unity was their internet explorer they tried to force on users.
I find it also very unprofessional its one thing if linux as developer makes some comments that are not PC but as CEO or what he is, you should be able to shut up and dont troll other people. Even if you belive you are right.
I guess thats the Trump version of running a business, making some big cracy attack statements on people to try to intimitate them to get what you want. The strange comparsions to gun control and climate change supports this I guess.
The data of gun controll effects are pretty clear so its no belive system its hard facts, but climate change is really a belive system, which does not mean that its not real, it just means that its not a very good exact science field, but dont start that discussion here.
I wonder if he is just a troll or if that is his strategy. Insulting people then sending them patches, they react very uncooperative, and then he can say: See I told you so that are asholes.
self-fullfilling prophesies.
Some investors forced him to do that move, else he would have stubbern tried to make that stuff work till the end of time. Thats what I hear from that bitter words.
He even startet forking gnome before gnome 3 even existed, so his claim that that was only a reaction to the gnome team is false, except he tried to push convergence on gnome 2. But than that would be his fault, I would not want to push I dont know VR on Windows 3.11.
I also dont belive he ever send a patch related to convergence, he shurly refered to general patches to gnome not specific to that..
Why is he such a sissy, just use the same base and libs and some infrastructure, cinnamon does that, and they dont whine about it, they just do it and have good success with it.
But therefor you would have to commit to desktop but you will push everything but desktop.
I am shure that when purism releases their gnome-phone they already talked about, it will be Mark that says look they finaly did what I told them to do. When such small company can make that work together WITH the community, you wonder how bad canonical is, if they dont get it to work.
Why doesnt he try to fork for real the linux kernel (not some small patches a real fork) and look what then happens, even companies like intel or even microsoft know that you have to get your shit in the official kernel tree or else it really really sucks. So even this much bigger companies know that they have to work WITH the community, maybe MS should send canonical a email to explain them that.
Also its not so much about WHAT they did, but HOW they did it. The FUD against wayland, the refusal of work of a developer of compiz they made belive that that work is needed, the spyware activated by default, the money steal action with that music-software, also how long did it take till a real gnome-shell blend of ubuntu was there? 3 years?
some users here even talk about gnome 3 was forced on users? Really? did the gnome team somehow restrict ubuntu or other distros to ship gnome2 alternative or exclusive? aperently not. But gnome forced unity on their users, at the end I had to deinstall unity and use 2 ppas to get a not even complete gnome 3 in ubuntu.
They activly fighted against gnome, using their market power, like preinstall internet explorer and give the user no other choice. Unity was their internet explorer they tried to force on users.
I find it also very unprofessional its one thing if linux as developer makes some comments that are not PC but as CEO or what he is, you should be able to shut up and dont troll other people. Even if you belive you are right.
I guess thats the Trump version of running a business, making some big cracy attack statements on people to try to intimitate them to get what you want. The strange comparsions to gun control and climate change supports this I guess.
The data of gun controll effects are pretty clear so its no belive system its hard facts, but climate change is really a belive system, which does not mean that its not real, it just means that its not a very good exact science field, but dont start that discussion here.
Comment