Originally posted by nslay
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Making The Case For Using Rust At Low Levels On Linux Systems
Collapse
X
-
I would love to see a Tor implementation or a SSH daemon written in Rust.
Rust sounds very suitable for high security scenarios.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Shimon View Post
Rust is not OO which can be a hard sell to C++ or Python veterans.
OO programming(in the Java sense) was a mistake.Last edited by peppercats; 10 June 2016, 04:09 PM.
- 2 likes
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by cb88 View Post
Because ADA derives from Pascal... VHDL also hails to ADA syntax. The problem is that it is so verbose that it is cumbersome...this could be alleviated somewhat with better tooling but it either doesn't exist or costs an appendage and half your offspring.
Emacs is probably as good as it gets free software wise for VHDL and ADA but I don't grok it.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by caligula View Post
Sure, the Ada compiler generates native binaries, but are they really comparable? Ada's feature set is close to Rust's main concepts?
Emacs is probably as good as it gets free software wise for VHDL and ADA but I don't grok it.
Leave a comment:
-
So in the author’s mind Rust is the way to go, just like systemd.
That’s not helping with my opinion of Rust.
Leave a comment:
-
I wonder why suddenly Rust generates so much hype while Ada has been there for years.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Shimon View Post
Rust is not OO which can be a hard sell to C++ or Python veterans.
- 1 like
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: