I decided to be nasty: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/4/7/124
Read and enjoy.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
A Stable Linux Kernel API/ABI? "The Most Insane Proposal" For Linux Development
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by unixfan2001 View Post'cept Microsoft is still the dominating force.
They can afford mistakes and treating customers badly. GNU/Linux desktop distros with their half a dozen users can't.
And yes. Steve Ballmer did ruin Microsoft, to an extent. The company has only been really flourishing again since Nadela took office.Last edited by SystemCrasher; 06 April 2016, 01:40 PM.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Stable API would halt kernel development (sorry, but Windows suxx, selling the very same kernel for 10 years) and vendors would try to feed us with fuckin' binary blobs. Hopefully mr Torvalds is smartass enough to get idea and swing his middle finger to blobbed companies. Who needs windows #2, dammit? There is already one.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by unixfan2001 View PostThey can afford mistakes and treating customers badly.
Originally posted by unixfan2001 View PostAnd yes. Steve Ballmer did ruin Microsoft, to an extent. The company has only been really flourishing again since Nadela took office.
In fact, I would say Gates has been the worst CEO so far. Because it was under his leadership that Microsoft became an almost complete monopolist in the 90s and then stopped innovating. Almost killing Windows in the process. Had Win ME been succeeded by yet another 9x, ME-generation OS, I'm not sure it would've done quite as well as Windows XP did.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by F1esDgSdUTYpm0iy View PostIt's working for Microsoft, isn't it? Releasing and continuing to maintain an OS whose core API just leaves it vulnerable, erratic decision making as far as the UI is concerned, ever increasing monitoring and data collection and, let's not forget, the intermittently forced Windows 10 update. Began forced then was made optional and now it's recommended, so almost forced again.
Point being -- treating your users like shit (or to be more on point, like cattle) is working fine for Microsoft! And, as far as attitude is concerned, Steve Ballmer was far worse than Linus Torvalds ever has been. And far more disturbed. Did he ruin Microsoft or Windows with that attitude of his? Nope.
TL;DR -- Linux not exactly having a dominating position in the desktop segment has, to be extremely precise, absolutely nothing to do with the personal attitude of the people in the Linux community. Absolutely nothing.
They can afford mistakes and treating customers badly. GNU/Linux desktop distros with their half a dozen users can't.
And yes. Steve Ballmer did ruin Microsoft, to an extent. The company has only been really flourishing again since Nadela took office.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by abu_shawarib View Post
I mean closed source binaries, not open source ones where they gonna always recompile anyway. Either your program is important enough that most distros ship it in easy way and make sure it's compatible, or you will suffer.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by duby229 View Post
That's a joke... Considering there must be at least 100 distributions that do it every single day, it isn't very funny either.
I mean closed source binaries, not open source ones where they gonna always recompile anyway. Either your program is important enough that most distros ship it in easy way and make sure it's compatible, or you will suffer.
Leave a comment:
-
Point being -- treating your users like shit (or to be more on point, like cattle) is working fine for Microsoft! And, as far as attitude is concerned, Steve Ballmer was far worse than Linus Torvalds ever has been. And far more disturbed. Did he ruin Microsoft or Windows with that attitude of his? Nope.
TL;DR -- Linux not exactly having a dominating position in the desktop segment has, to be extremely precise, absolutely nothing to do with the personal attitude of the people in the Linux community. Absolutely nothing.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by unixfan2001 View Post
And most of them use a traditional packaging system with a graphical or textual UI.
The moment one piece of software a user requires isn't available, 90% of your users will switch back to Windows or Mac OS X.
Doesn't matter how straight forward you think adding 3rd party sources is.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by unixfan2001 View Postduby229
So how is blaming the customer working out for desktop GNU/Linux, so far? Do you honestly believe you'll ever be able to surpass 2% with an attitude like that?
I don't think the average customer very much likes being screamed at or being called all names in the book.
You don't like the way things work, but the fact is things work the way they do because of decades of trial and error. And it's because of that vast amount of experience that linux today is absolutely indispensable as it is.Last edited by duby229; 04 April 2016, 12:22 PM.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: