Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Google Launches "Brotli" Compression Algorithm For The Web

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Google Launches "Brotli" Compression Algorithm For The Web

    Phoronix: Google Launches "Brotli" Compression Algorithm For The Web

    Google has announced today Brotli, "a new compression algorithm for the Internet" that easily defeats other compression algorithms...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite

  • #2
    The link to the announcement is not working.

    Comment


    • #3
      You too you see: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366559 ?
      Yes, but zopfli is zlib/gzip compatible (useful for png and all static content or with cache)
      http://www.first-world.info/comment-...mpression.html
      Very useful on network stream
      Last edited by alpha_one_x86; 22 September 2015, 02:26 PM.
      Developer of Ultracopier/CatchChallenger and CEO of Confiared

      Comment


      • #4
        I'd love to see some comparisons between Brotli, LZMA2, and XZ (which is a sub-format of LZMA/2 iirc)

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by linuxjacques View Post
          The link to the announcement is not working.
          Whoops, fixed. Thanks.
          Michael Larabel
          https://www.michaellarabel.com/

          Comment


          • #6
            while compressing more densely than LZMA -> no, internal benchmark show it, less ratio than lzma (worse for static content or with cache), but better than bzip2 and zlib, with similar compression/decompression speed of zlib or better (depend greatly of the content)
            Developer of Ultracopier/CatchChallenger and CEO of Confiared

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by alpha_one_x86 View Post
              while compressing more densely than LZMA -> no, internal benchmark show it, less ratio than lzma (worse for static content or with cache), but better than bzip2 and zlib, with similar compression/decompression speed of zlib or better (depend greatly of the content)
              The linked blog post actually says that it compresses more densely in one specific test. They didn't make it a general statement.

              Comment


              • #8
                Hasn't this been used for the WOFF2 format for months now? So how is it new, exactly?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Daktyl198 View Post
                  I'd love to see some comparisons between Brotli, LZMA2, and XZ (which is a sub-format of LZMA/2 iirc)
                  ​https://quixdb.github.io/squash-benchmark/. Disclaimer: I created that benchmark.

                  Originally posted by CrystalGamma
                  Hasn't this been used for the WOFF2 format for months now? So how is it new, exactly?
                  It's not really new, it's just gotten a *lot* better lately. Until pretty recently it really wasn't competitive.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by CrystalGamma View Post
                    Hasn't this been used for the WOFF2 format for months now? So how is it new, exactly?
                    Brotli has been around for a fairly long time, just recently they've added some optimizations and then then the heuristics for trading compression performance for runtime performance.

                    Old brotli had great compression but was very very slow. This looks like a potential gzip replacement.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X