Originally posted by jbysmith
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Azure Cloud Switch: Microsoft's Own Linux Platform
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by edmon View Post
Despite its name, NT had very little in common with OS/2 as it existed at the time (that is, OS/2 1.x) in terms of design or source code.
Read little more than just heading.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by signals View Post
That may have helped corporate Linux adoption more than you think. The work they did to get Linux running on their hypervisor allows us to deploy Linux-based solutions to sites that are already running a Hyper-V stack. Without the effort they put in to getting Linux to run in their virtual environment, those would have ended up being Windows-based deployments.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DMJC View PostMicrosoft's bread and butter remains exchange, outlook, office, and windows. Windows Server/MSSQL still remains a mainstay of my day to day corporate IT work. That doesn't look to change any time soon. Linux still hasn't got a Microsoft SQL Server implementation and until it does it won't be used by many companies. We still can't replace the Windows server stack in many environments because of a lack of software on Linux. I know that a lot of people would argue for mysql/alternatives and they are great alternatives. But companies don't want to change from what they know, and it's actually the client apps on Windows that would need updating to let Linux in on the server side.
Won't happen any time soon.
Projects like Samba 4 and Openchange are awesome. It's unfortunate that Openchange can't be managed by the Exchange Management Console, but Samba 4 has done an insanely cool job. Personally I want to see the Windows Remote Server Admin tools running on ReactOS with an RDP Server/Client as well. We would seriously consider installing ReactOS for management + Linux DCs on Virtual hosts at some of our clients if that was available.
I think Linux needs to focus on individual markets, eg take on Office with Open Office, take on gaming with SteamOS/SteamBox/Steam, take on Flight simulator market by getting support for all the new/old peripherals and getting the engines ported/supported via emulation. As each market falls to Linux it snowballs other markets.
I think pgsql scales as well as sqlserver, possibly even Oracle, at this point but I've not seen updates about that for a few years.
Leave a comment:
-
Try reading the documentation for using a MS server OS for any type of networking and you will understand why they are using Linux. After killing off ISA server they renamed every network related term and went about ensuring no one could ever not pay MS for every configuration change needed.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by schmidtbag View PostAgreed. It's pretty sad that a company as big as MS that has done everything in it's power to eliminate competition can't develop something good enough for their own servers. That's like Ford designing a car with a Toyota engine in it - doesn't mean the product will be bad but it's a bit hypocritical.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by edmon View Post
so, this is where NT came from..
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by pal666 View Postlearn to read. he didn't say that there is such platform, he just said that windows is bad for everything.
Originally posted by pal666 View Postgazillions disagree with "Microsoft would be a lot more productive and earn much more money switching to Linux" ? what are you smoking? gazillions do not care about productiveness of ms.
Originally posted by pal666 View Postlol, ms troll detected. microsoft is sponsor of biggest patent trolls.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by edmon View Post
Despite its name, NT had very little in common with OS/2 as it existed at the time (that is, OS/2 1.x) in terms of design or source code.
Read little more than just heading.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by jbysmith View PostAnd you're welcome to your opinion, but sadly that's all it is, there's a gazillion people who disagree with you. I know a fair number of enterprise developers who would love to argue the "especially not with servers" point.
Originally posted by jbysmith View PostOutside of forum zealotry, actual professionals who use these tools on a daily basis know that their is no one platform to cover everything, it doesn't exist.
Originally posted by jbysmith View PostFUD at it's finest, "how long" and maybes is cute. Meanwhile other companies are actually suing each other over software infringements, and shockingly Microsoft isn't one of them. Had to check my calendar and make sure it wasn't still 1995. Companies change, Microsoft has dramatically improved, other companies dramatically worsen, such as Google for example.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: